VXZ vs. EFAV
Compare and contrast key facts about iPath Series B S&P 500® VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV).
VXZ is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures Index Total Return. It was launched on Jan 17, 2018. EFAV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2011. Both VXZ and EFAV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VXZ or EFAV.
Key characteristics
| VXZ | EFAV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -15.47% | 7.06% |
| 1Y Return | -22.04% | 14.90% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -21.49% | 0.65% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -8.10% | 2.30% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.73 | 1.57 |
| Sortino Ratio | -1.06 | 2.23 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.88 | 1.27 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.31 | 1.15 |
| Martin Ratio | -1.37 | 8.44 |
| Ulcer Index | 15.85% | 1.83% |
| Daily Std Dev | 29.82% | 9.86% |
| Max Drawdown | -68.91% | -27.56% |
| Current Drawdown | -68.24% | -5.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between VXZ and EFAV is -0.50. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
VXZ vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VXZ achieves a -15.47% return, which is significantly lower than EFAV's 7.06% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VXZ vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iPath Series B S&P 500® VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VXZ vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison
VXZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EFAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VXZ iPath Series B S&P 500® VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF | 3.09% | 3.07% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 1.33% | 4.19% | 3.34% | 2.45% | 3.94% | 2.49% | 3.57% | 2.53% |
Drawdowns
VXZ vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VXZ drawdown since its inception was -68.91%, which is greater than EFAV's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXZ and EFAV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VXZ vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison
iPath Series B S&P 500® VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) at 3.25%. This indicates that VXZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.