1913.HK vs. ADM
Compare and contrast key facts about Prada SpA (1913.HK) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM).
Performance
1913.HK vs. ADM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
1913.HK vs. ADM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1913.HK Prada SpA | -16.58% | -22.89% | 37.17% | 2.91% | -10.53% | -1.93% | 59.01% | 27.69% | -7.24% | 11.69% |
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 27.70% | 18.47% | -27.90% | -20.43% | 40.22% | 38.07% | 11.94% | 16.48% | 5.51% | -8.78% |
Different Trading Currencies
1913.HK is traded in HKD, while ADM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ADM values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 1913.HK achieves a -16.58% return, which is significantly lower than ADM's 27.70% return. Over the past 10 years, 1913.HK has underperformed ADM with an annualized return of 5.84%, while ADM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.44% annualized return.
1913.HK
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -14.06%
- YTD
- -16.58%
- 6M
- -19.79%
- 1Y
- -29.46%
- 3Y*
- -10.39%
- 5Y*
- -3.76%
- 10Y*
- 5.84%
ADM
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 4.17%
- YTD
- 27.70%
- 6M
- 24.99%
- 1Y
- 56.52%
- 3Y*
- 0.03%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 10.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
1913.HK vs. ADM — Risk / Return Rank
1913.HK
ADM
1913.HK vs. ADM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prada SpA (1913.HK) and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 1913.HK | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | 2.00 | -2.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | 2.67 | -3.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.35 | -0.47 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 4.26 | -5.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.60 | 11.88 | -13.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 1913.HK | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.81 | 2.00 | -2.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | 0.28 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 0.39 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.21 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between 1913.HK and ADM is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
1913.HK vs. ADM - Dividend Comparison
1913.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than ADM's 2.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1913.HK Prada SpA | 3.81% | 3.18% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.31% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 1.64% | 2.73% | 4.14% | 3.60% | 3.83% |
ADM Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 2.83% | 3.55% | 3.96% | 2.49% | 1.72% | 2.19% | 2.86% | 3.02% | 3.27% | 3.19% | 2.63% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
1913.HK vs. ADM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 1913.HK drawdown since its inception was -73.91%, which is greater than ADM's maximum drawdown of -68.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1913.HK and ADM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 1913.HK | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.91% | -68.01% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.15% | -12.88% | -20.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.60% | -54.14% | +7.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.94% | -54.14% | -3.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.08% | -17.77% | -27.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.26% | -21.63% | -15.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.43% | 4.65% | +13.78% |
Volatility
1913.HK vs. ADM - Volatility Comparison
Prada SpA (1913.HK) has a higher volatility of 11.29% compared to Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) at 9.50%. This indicates that 1913.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 1913.HK | ADM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.29% | 9.50% | +1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.63% | 19.56% | +4.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.01% | 28.41% | +8.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.16% | 27.96% | +14.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.27% | 26.90% | +14.37% |
Financials
1913.HK vs. ADM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prada SpA and Archer-Daniels-Midland Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities