18MM.DE vs. AMEA.DE
18MM.DE (Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR) and AMEA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from Amundi - 18MM.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI Filtered PAB while AMEA.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, 18MM.DE returned 4.46%/yr vs 11.07%/yr for AMEA.DE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 18MM.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AMEA.DE.
Performance
18MM.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 18MM.DE achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly lower than AMEA.DE's 31.99% return. Over the past 10 years, 18MM.DE has underperformed AMEA.DE with an annualized return of 4.46%, while AMEA.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.07% annualized return.
18MM.DE
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -5.29%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 2.70%
- 1Y
- 0.13%
- 3Y*
- 2.40%
- 5Y*
- 1.50%
- 10Y*
- 4.46%
AMEA.DE
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 31.99%
- 6M
- 32.57%
- 1Y
- 54.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
18MM.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18MM.DE Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR | 2.24% | 0.05% | 5.93% | 1.38% | -7.30% | 14.57% | -5.45% | 21.40% | -6.44% | 10.50% |
AMEA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR | 31.99% | 18.01% | 18.95% | 3.12% | -15.34% | 1.62% | 15.62% | 22.11% | -12.33% | 25.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between 18MM.DE and AMEA.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2011 | 0.63 |
The correlation between 18MM.DE and AMEA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.68 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
18MM.DE vs. AMEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
18MM.DE
AMEA.DE
18MM.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR (18MM.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 18MM.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.50 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 4.74 | -4.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.42 | 17.16 | -16.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 18MM.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 | 2.85 | -2.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.48 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.58 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.56 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
18MM.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 18MM.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.82%, which is greater than AMEA.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 18MM.DE and AMEA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 18MM.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.82% | -34.43% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.51% | -11.58% | +5.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.52% | -20.48% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.20% | -28.78% | +6.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.82% | -33.31% | -3.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.39% | -2.69% | -2.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -11.52% | +3.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 3.21% | -0.63% |
Volatility
18MM.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF EUR (18MM.DE) is 3.57%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) has a volatility of 8.10%. This indicates that 18MM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMEA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 18MM.DE | AMEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 8.10% | -4.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.29% | 16.15% | -5.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.51% | 19.29% | -5.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 18.27% | -3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.60% | 18.97% | -2.37% |
18MM.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
18MM.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than AMEA.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
18MM.DE vs. AMEA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 18MM.DE nor AMEA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
18MM.DE and AMEA.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMEA.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMEA.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for 18MM.DE.
18MM.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI Filtered PAB, while AMEA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for 18MM.DE and 0.20% for AMEA.DE.
Find the right allocation for 18MM.DE and AMEA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer