18MF.DE vs. 3JPN.DE
18MF.DE (Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF) and 3JPN.DE (Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities) are both Leveraged Equities funds. 18MF.DE is passively managed, while 3JPN.DE is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, 18MF.DE returned 32.82%/yr vs 20.30%/yr for 3JPN.DE. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 18MF.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 3JPN.DE.
Performance
18MF.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 18MF.DE achieves a 21.45% return, which is significantly lower than 3JPN.DE's 37.51% return.
18MF.DE
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.64%
- YTD
- 21.45%
- 6M
- 20.92%
- 1Y
- 50.02%
- 3Y*
- 32.82%
- 5Y*
- 23.27%
- 10Y*
- 25.40%
3JPN.DE
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 15.49%
- YTD
- 37.51%
- 6M
- 33.89%
- 1Y
- 68.56%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
18MF.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18MF.DE Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF | 21.45% | 1.66% | 64.13% | 43.13% | -21.06% |
3JPN.DE Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities | 37.51% | 27.74% | 0.10% | 34.83% | 0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between 18MF.DE and 3JPN.DE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2022 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
18MF.DE vs. 3JPN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
18MF.DE
3JPN.DE
18MF.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF (18MF.DE) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities (3JPN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 18MF.DE | 3JPN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.23 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 1.96 | +1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.13 | 5.61 | +5.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 18MF.DE | 3JPN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 1.13 | +1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.50 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
18MF.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 18MF.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.67%, which is greater than 3JPN.DE's maximum drawdown of -51.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 18MF.DE and 3JPN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 18MF.DE | 3JPN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.67% | -51.65% | -8.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.95% | -34.71% | +19.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.90% | -51.65% | +8.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -7.07% | +6.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.91% | -14.56% | +4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.48% | 12.19% | -7.71% |
Volatility
18MF.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi ETF Leveraged MSCI USA Daily UCITS ETF (18MF.DE) is 5.41%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities (3JPN.DE) has a volatility of 11.68%. This indicates that 18MF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3JPN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 18MF.DE | 3JPN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 11.68% | -6.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.46% | 48.68% | -33.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.36% | 60.28% | -36.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.89% | 52.77% | -21.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.49% | 52.77% | -20.28% |
18MF.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
18MF.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than 3JPN.DE's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
18MF.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 18MF.DE nor 3JPN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
18MF.DE and 3JPN.DE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 18MF.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
18MF.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3JPN.DE.
They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for 18MF.DE and 0.75% for 3JPN.DE.
Find the right allocation for 18MF.DE and 3JPN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer