18M2.DE vs. AMED.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

18M2.DE (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU High Dividend UCITS ETF EUR) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi - 18M2.DE tracks the MSCI EMU High Dividend Yield while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, 18M2.DE returned 8.26%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for AMED.DE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. 18M2.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.

Performance

18M2.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi ETF MSCI EMU High Dividend UCITS ETF EUR (18M2.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 18M2.DE achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 16.87% return. Over the past 10 years, 18M2.DE has underperformed AMED.DE with an annualized return of 8.26%, while AMED.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.75% annualized return.

18M2.DE

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 6.76%
• 6M: 8.84%
• 1Y: 15.86%
• 3Y*: 12.13%
• 5Y*: 8.90%
• 10Y*: 8.26%

AMED.DE

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 7.96%
• YTD: 16.87%
• 6M: 18.54%
• 1Y: 26.45%
• 3Y*: 16.11%
• 5Y*: 10.41%
• 10Y*: 9.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

18M2.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
18M2.DE Amundi ETF MSCI EMU High Dividend UCITS ETF EUR	6.76%	21.49%	3.36%	16.14%	-6.47%	16.02%	-6.39%	24.91%	-4.44%	7.99%
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)	16.87%	20.15%	5.95%	16.68%	-10.71%	20.90%	-1.35%	27.22%	-12.98%	11.86%

Correlation

The correlation between 18M2.DE and AMED.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2010	0.89

The correlation between 18M2.DE and AMED.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

18M2.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

18M2.DE

18M2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 45
18M2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
18M2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
18M2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
18M2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
18M2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 42

AMED.DE

AMED.DE Risk / Return Rank: 53
AMED.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
AMED.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
AMED.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 53
AMED.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
AMED.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

18M2.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI EMU High Dividend UCITS ETF EUR (18M2.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	18M2.DE	AMED.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	1.74	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	2.58	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.33	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.55	2.49	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.71	9.40	-2.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

18M2.DE vs. AMED.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 18M2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the AMED.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 18M2.DE and AMED.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	18M2.DE	AMED.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	1.74	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.65	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.57	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.47	-0.03

Drawdowns

18M2.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 18M2.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.06%, roughly equal to the maximum AMED.DE drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 18M2.DE and AMED.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	18M2.DE	AMED.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.06%	-38.35%	+1.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.19%	-10.56%	+4.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.68%	-14.07%	-0.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.81%	-24.06%	+3.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.06%	-38.35%	+1.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.44%	-0.17%	-1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.42%	-6.69%	+0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.36%	2.81%	-0.45%

Volatility

18M2.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi ETF MSCI EMU High Dividend UCITS ETF EUR (18M2.DE) is 2.63%, while Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that 18M2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	18M2.DE	AMED.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.63%	5.61%	-2.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.33%	12.64%	-4.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.62%	15.19%	-4.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.41%	15.87%	-2.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.44%	17.00%	-1.56%

18M2.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

18M2.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

18M2.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 18M2.DE nor AMED.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 18M2.DE and AMED.DE in my portfolio?

18M2.DE and AMED.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 18M2.DE or AMED.DE?

On fees, AMED.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 18M2.DE or AMED.DE?

AMED.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for 18M2.DE.

What is the main difference between 18M2.DE and AMED.DE?

18M2.DE tracks MSCI EMU High Dividend Yield, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for 18M2.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.