PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
1810.HK vs. WMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

1810.HK vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

1810.HK is traded in HKD, while WMT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WMT values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1810.HK achieves a -33.33% return, which is significantly lower than WMT's 9.80% return.


1810.HK

1D
1.39%
1M
-17.61%
YTD
-33.33%
6M
-39.01%
1Y
-49.81%
3Y*
33.79%
5Y*
-1.43%
10Y*

WMT

1D
0.44%
1M
-7.87%
YTD
9.80%
6M
4.81%
1Y
28.47%
3Y*
34.19%
5Y*
22.65%
10Y*
19.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1810.HK vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
1810.HK
Xiaomi Corp
-33.33%13.91%121.15%42.60%-42.12%-42.81%206.59%-16.56%-22.17%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
9.80%24.73%73.09%12.87%-0.30%2.52%22.77%29.48%11.22%

Correlation

The correlation between 1810.HK and WMT is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2018

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

1810.HK vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1810.HK
1810.HK Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
1810.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1810.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
1810.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
1810.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
1810.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

WMT
WMT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1810.HK vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


1810.HKWMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.74

1.23

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

1.82

-2.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.51

5.77

-7.27

1810.HK vs. WMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1810.HK Sharpe Ratio is -1.43, which is lower than the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1810.HK and WMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

1810.HK vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1810.HK drawdown since its inception was -76.06%, which is greater than WMT's maximum drawdown of -36.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1810.HK and WMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


1810.HKWMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.06%

-36.47%

-39.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.04%

-15.71%

-41.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.04%

-22.10%

-34.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.66%

-25.70%

-44.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.44%

-9.79%

-46.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.06%

-8.66%

-33.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.21%

4.95%

+28.26%

Volatility

1810.HK vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) is 9.01%, while Walmart Inc. (WMT) has a volatility of 9.84%. This indicates that 1810.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


1810.HKWMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.01%

9.84%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.27%

18.49%

+7.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.47%

23.64%

+11.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.12%

21.68%

+22.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.76%

21.71%

+24.05%

Dividends

1810.HK vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

1810.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
1810.HK
Xiaomi Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.80%0.84%0.92%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%

Financials

1810.HK vs. WMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Xiaomi Corp and Walmart Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. 1810.HK values in HKD, WMT values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


1810.HK and WMT have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 1810.HK and WMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer