1810.HK vs. ISLN.L
1810.HK (Xiaomi Corp) is a stock, while ISLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Over the past 5 years, 1810.HK returned -1.43%/yr vs 19.28%/yr for ISLN.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
1810.HK vs. ISLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
1810.HK is traded in HKD, while ISLN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISLN.L values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 1810.HK achieves a -33.33% return, which is significantly lower than ISLN.L's -4.96% return.
1810.HK
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -17.40%
- YTD
- -33.33%
- 6M
- -39.01%
- 1Y
- -49.57%
- 3Y*
- 33.79%
- 5Y*
- -1.43%
- 10Y*
- —
ISLN.L
- 1D
- 5.79%
- 1M
- -20.56%
- YTD
- -4.96%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- 1Y
- 86.05%
- 3Y*
- 41.39%
- 5Y*
- 19.28%
- 10Y*
- 14.37%
1810.HK vs. ISLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1810.HK Xiaomi Corp | -33.33% | 13.91% | 121.15% | 42.60% | -42.12% | -42.81% | 206.59% | -16.56% | -22.17% |
ISLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | -4.96% | 148.10% | 20.47% | -0.77% | 3.57% | -12.38% | 45.20% | 15.75% | -3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between 1810.HK and ISLN.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2018 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
1810.HK vs. ISLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
1810.HK
ISLN.L
1810.HK vs. ISLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 1810.HK | ISLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 1.29 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 1.96 | -2.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.51 | 4.37 | -5.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
1810.HK vs. ISLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 1810.HK drawdown since its inception was -76.06%, roughly equal to the maximum ISLN.L drawdown of -76.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1810.HK and ISLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 1810.HK | ISLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.06% | -76.70% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.04% | -43.57% | -13.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.04% | -43.57% | -13.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.66% | -43.57% | -27.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.44% | -40.31% | -16.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.06% | -53.62% | +11.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.21% | 19.56% | +13.65% |
Volatility
1810.HK vs. ISLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) is 9.01%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) has a volatility of 15.91%. This indicates that 1810.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 1810.HK | ISLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.01% | 15.91% | -6.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.27% | 54.94% | -28.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.47% | 57.82% | -22.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.12% | 35.78% | +8.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.76% | 31.06% | +14.70% |
Dividends
1810.HK vs. ISLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 1810.HK nor ISLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
1810.HK and ISLN.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for 1810.HK and ISLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer