PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
1787.HK vs. 2899.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

1787.HK vs. 2899.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Shandong Gold Mining Co Ltd (1787.HK) and Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H (2899.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1787.HK achieves a -33.41% return, which is significantly lower than 2899.HK's -6.56% return.


1787.HK

1D
-2.78%
1M
-22.99%
YTD
-33.41%
6M
-33.79%
1Y
-6.23%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*

2899.HK

1D
-2.69%
1M
-10.67%
YTD
-6.56%
6M
-3.14%
1Y
87.29%
3Y*
45.75%
5Y*
26.64%
10Y*
34.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1787.HK vs. 2899.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
1787.HK
Shandong Gold Mining Co Ltd
-33.41%178.62%-14.03%2.86%9.02%-25.18%36.24%36.93%29.80%
2899.HK
Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H
-6.56%158.44%13.36%23.33%16.65%7.13%134.01%36.30%-1.33%

Correlation

The correlation between 1787.HK and 2899.HK is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018

0.59

The correlation between 1787.HK and 2899.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

1787.HK vs. 2899.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1787.HK
1787.HK Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
1787.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1787.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
1787.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
1787.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
1787.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

2899.HK
2899.HK Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
2899.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2899.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
2899.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
2899.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
2899.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1787.HK vs. 2899.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shandong Gold Mining Co Ltd (1787.HK) and Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H (2899.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


1787.HK2899.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.28

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

2.96

-3.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.33

7.05

-7.38

1787.HK vs. 2899.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1787.HK Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the 2899.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1787.HK and 2899.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


1787.HK2899.HKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

1.87

-2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.62

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.50

-0.11

Drawdowns

1787.HK vs. 2899.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1787.HK drawdown since its inception was -55.53%, smaller than the maximum 2899.HK drawdown of -89.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1787.HK and 2899.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


1787.HK2899.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.53%

-89.63%

+34.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.39%

-29.61%

-25.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.39%

-29.61%

-25.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.39%

-46.93%

-8.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.39%

-27.79%

-27.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.14%

-39.54%

+11.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.29%

12.27%

+11.02%

Volatility

1787.HK vs. 2899.HK - Volatility Comparison

Shandong Gold Mining Co Ltd (1787.HK) and Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H (2899.HK) have volatilities of 14.53% and 14.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


1787.HK2899.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.53%

14.52%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.92%

35.39%

+6.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.30%

46.88%

+9.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.81%

44.16%

-1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.86%

44.46%

-0.60%

Dividends

1787.HK vs. 2899.HK - Dividend Comparison

1787.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than 2899.HK's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
1787.HK
Shandong Gold Mining Co Ltd
1.53%1.02%1.92%0.52%0.41%0.45%0.86%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
2899.HK
Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H
0.72%1.53%2.33%2.18%2.20%1.56%1.25%2.93%3.74%2.33%2.83%5.00%

Financials

1787.HK vs. 2899.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Shandong Gold Mining Co Ltd and Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in HKD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


1787.HK and 2899.HK have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 1787.HK and 2899.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer