PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2899.HK vs. CSPX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2899.HK vs. CSPX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H (2899.HK) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

2899.HK is traded in HKD, while CSPX.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSPX.L values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2899.HK achieves a -6.56% return, which is significantly lower than CSPX.L's 11.04% return. Over the past 10 years, 2899.HK has outperformed CSPX.L with an annualized return of 34.05%, while CSPX.L has yielded a comparatively lower 15.32% annualized return.


2899.HK

1D
-2.69%
1M
-10.67%
YTD
-6.56%
6M
-3.14%
1Y
87.29%
3Y*
45.75%
5Y*
26.64%
10Y*
34.05%

CSPX.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
3.22%
YTD
11.04%
6M
11.52%
1Y
27.36%
3Y*
22.15%
5Y*
13.94%
10Y*
15.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2899.HK vs. CSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
2899.HK
Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H
-6.56%158.44%13.36%23.33%16.65%7.13%134.01%36.30%3.91%21.20%
CSPX.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.04%17.68%24.61%26.72%-18.58%30.05%17.10%29.86%-5.25%22.53%

Correlation

The correlation between 2899.HK and CSPX.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2010

0.17

The correlation between 2899.HK and CSPX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2899.HK vs. CSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2899.HK
2899.HK Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
2899.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2899.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
2899.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
2899.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
2899.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

CSPX.L
CSPX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CSPX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSPX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2899.HK vs. CSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H (2899.HK) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2899.HKCSPX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.42

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

3.50

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.05

15.31

-8.25

2899.HK vs. CSPX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2899.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the CSPX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2899.HK and CSPX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2899.HKCSPX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

2.30

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.87

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.94

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.95

-0.45

Drawdowns

2899.HK vs. CSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2899.HK drawdown since its inception was -89.63%, which is greater than CSPX.L's maximum drawdown of -34.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2899.HK and CSPX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2899.HKCSPX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.63%

-34.04%

-55.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.61%

-7.76%

-21.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.61%

-18.61%

-11.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.93%

-23.90%

-23.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.85%

-34.04%

-14.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.79%

-0.57%

-27.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.54%

-3.65%

-35.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.27%

1.79%

+10.48%

Volatility

2899.HK vs. CSPX.L - Volatility Comparison

Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H (2899.HK) has a higher volatility of 14.52% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CSPX.L) at 3.14%. This indicates that 2899.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2899.HKCSPX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.52%

3.14%

+11.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.39%

8.73%

+26.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.88%

11.80%

+35.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.16%

15.97%

+28.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.46%

16.17%

+28.29%

Dividends

2899.HK vs. CSPX.L - Dividend Comparison

2899.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, while CSPX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
2899.HK
Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H
0.72%1.53%2.33%2.18%2.20%1.56%1.25%2.93%3.74%2.33%2.83%5.00%
CSPX.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


2899.HK and CSPX.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2899.HK and CSPX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer