PortfoliosLab logo
2899.HK vs. KGC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between 2899.HK and KGC is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

2899.HK vs. KGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H (2899.HK) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%1,000.00%2,000.00%3,000.00%4,000.00%5,000.00%6,000.00%7,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
6,398.77%
113.89%
2899.HK
KGC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

2899.HK:

0.11

KGC:

2.60

Sortino Ratio

2899.HK:

0.45

KGC:

3.14

Omega Ratio

2899.HK:

1.06

KGC:

1.42

Calmar Ratio

2899.HK:

0.19

KGC:

1.62

Martin Ratio

2899.HK:

0.32

KGC:

20.21

Ulcer Index

2899.HK:

17.23%

KGC:

6.02%

Daily Std Dev

2899.HK:

40.87%

KGC:

43.16%

Max Drawdown

2899.HK:

-89.63%

KGC:

-96.04%

Current Drawdown

2899.HK:

-8.84%

KGC:

-44.42%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

2899.HK:

HK$488.01B

KGC:

$17.85B

EPS

2899.HK:

HK$1.42

KGC:

$0.77

PE Ratio

2899.HK:

12.21

KGC:

18.84

PS Ratio

2899.HK:

1.60

KGC:

3.40

PB Ratio

2899.HK:

2.98

KGC:

2.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

2899.HK:

HK$307.79B

KGC:

$5.56B

Gross Profit (TTM)

2899.HK:

HK$67.51B

KGC:

$2.53B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2899.HK achieves a 24.29% return, which is significantly lower than KGC's 59.76% return. Over the past 10 years, 2899.HK has outperformed KGC with an annualized return of 23.36%, while KGC has yielded a comparatively lower 20.66% annualized return.


2899.HK

YTD

24.29%

1M

18.92%

6M

7.45%

1Y

4.20%

5Y*

44.14%

10Y*

23.36%

KGC

YTD

59.76%

1M

23.49%

6M

38.96%

1Y

110.69%

5Y*

18.44%

10Y*

20.66%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

2899.HK vs. KGC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2899.HK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of 2899.HK is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of 2899.HK is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of 2899.HK is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of 2899.HK is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of 2899.HK is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of 2899.HK is 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

KGC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KGC is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KGC is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KGC is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KGC is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KGC is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KGC is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

2899.HK vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H (2899.HK) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current 2899.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the KGC Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2899.HK and KGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.12
2.53
2899.HK
KGC

Dividends

2899.HK vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison

2899.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than KGC's 0.81% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
2899.HK
Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H
1.87%2.33%2.18%2.20%1.56%1.25%2.93%3.74%2.33%2.83%5.00%4.57%
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
0.81%1.29%1.98%2.93%2.07%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

2899.HK vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2899.HK drawdown since its inception was -89.63%, smaller than the maximum KGC drawdown of -96.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2899.HK and KGC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-8.55%
-36.33%
2899.HK
KGC

Volatility

2899.HK vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H (2899.HK) is 11.30%, while Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) has a volatility of 15.12%. This indicates that 2899.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
11.30%
15.12%
2899.HK
KGC

Financials

2899.HK vs. KGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20212022202320242025
78.93B
1.50B
(2899.HK) Total Revenue
(KGC) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. 2899.HK values in HKD, KGC values in USD

2899.HK vs. KGC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H and Kinross Gold Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
22.9%
44.2%
(2899.HK) Gross Margin
(KGC) Gross Margin
2899.HK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H reported a gross profit of 18.06B and revenue of 78.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.9%.

KGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 662.40M and revenue of 1.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.2%.

2899.HK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H reported an operating income of 13.75B and revenue of 78.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

KGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 557.80M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.3%.

2899.HK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd-H reported a net income of 10.17B and revenue of 78.93B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.

KGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 368.00M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in a net margin of 24.6%.