1691.HK vs. KSTR

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Js Global Lifestyle Company Ltd (1691.HK) and KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR).

KSTR is a passively managed fund by KraneShares that tracks the performance of the SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2021.

Performance

1691.HK vs. KSTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Js Global Lifestyle Company Ltd (1691.HK) and KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

1691.HK vs. KSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
1691.HK Js Global Lifestyle Company Ltd	-8.29%	38.85%	-10.32%	-81.55%	-32.76%	-29.21%
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF	0.42%	43.10%	5.57%	-17.94%	-38.41%	-1.14%

Different Trading Currencies

1691.HK is traded in HKD, while KSTR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KSTR values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1691.HK achieves a -8.29% return, which is significantly lower than KSTR's 0.42% return.

1691.HK

• 1D: -1.67%
• 1M: -2.21%
• YTD: -8.29%
• 6M: -4.32%
• 1Y: -6.35%
• 3Y*: -38.23%
• 5Y*: -40.59%
• 10Y*: —

KSTR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -2.52%
• YTD: 0.42%
• 6M: -7.98%
• 1Y: 35.53%
• 3Y*: 1.73%
• 5Y*: -2.66%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

1691.HK vs. KSTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1691.HK

1691.HK Risk / Return Rank: 33
1691.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
1691.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
1691.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 30
1691.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
1691.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 35

KSTR

KSTR Risk / Return Rank: 51
KSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
KSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
KSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 51
KSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
KSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1691.HK vs. KSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Js Global Lifestyle Company Ltd (1691.HK) and KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	1691.HK	KSTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.15	1.09	-1.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.08	1.63	-1.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.22	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	1.99	-2.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.27	5.28	-5.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

1691.HK vs. KSTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1691.HK Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the KSTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1691.HK and KSTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	1691.HK	KSTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15	1.09	-1.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.63	-0.07	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.24	-0.14	-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between 1691.HK and KSTR is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

1691.HK vs. KSTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither 1691.HK nor KSTR has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
1691.HK Js Global Lifestyle Company Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.06%	0.80%	0.35%	0.65%
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

1691.HK vs. KSTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1691.HK drawdown since its inception was -95.91%, which is greater than KSTR's maximum drawdown of -66.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1691.HK and KSTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	1691.HK	KSTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.91%	-66.46%	-29.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.88%	-17.70%	-8.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-95.91%	-66.46%	-29.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.77%	-34.62%	-58.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-61.76%	-39.45%	-22.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.73%	6.74%	+8.99%

Volatility

1691.HK vs. KSTR - Volatility Comparison

Js Global Lifestyle Company Ltd (1691.HK) and KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) have volatilities of 8.28% and 7.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	1691.HK	KSTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.28%	7.90%	+0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.83%	22.44%	-3.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.20%	32.62%	+9.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	65.83%	37.37%	+28.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.83%	37.15%	+30.68%