1658.HK vs. 3988.HK

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

1658.HK (Postal Savings Bank of China) and 3988.HK (Bank of China Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — 1658.HK in Banks - Regional, 3988.HK in Banks - Diversified. Over the past 5 years, 1658.HK returned 4.39%/yr vs 20.60%/yr for 3988.HK. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

1658.HK vs. 3988.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Postal Savings Bank of China (1658.HK) and Bank of China Limited (3988.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1658.HK achieves a -3.17% return, which is significantly lower than 3988.HK's 17.71% return.

1658.HK

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -2.52%
• YTD: -3.17%
• 6M: -4.25%
• 1Y: 0.81%
• 3Y*: 6.97%
• 5Y*: 4.39%
• 10Y*: —

3988.HK

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 1.94%
• YTD: 17.71%
• 6M: 15.38%
• 1Y: 16.90%
• 3Y*: 29.10%
• 5Y*: 20.60%
• 10Y*: 12.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1658.HK vs. 3988.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
1658.HK Postal Savings Bank of China	-3.17%	19.16%	35.63%	-18.41%	-7.01%	31.96%	-13.79%	34.65%	5.33%	-1.26%
3988.HK Bank of China Limited	17.71%	22.65%	43.37%	14.21%	10.25%	14.66%	-14.78%	4.69%	-6.88%	17.45%

Correlation

The correlation between 1658.HK and 3988.HK is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016	0.61

The correlation between 1658.HK and 3988.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.72 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

1658.HK vs. 3988.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1658.HK

1658.HK Risk / Return Rank: 39
1658.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
1658.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
1658.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 34
1658.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
1658.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 42

3988.HK

3988.HK Risk / Return Rank: 68
3988.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
3988.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
3988.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 63
3988.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
3988.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1658.HK vs. 3988.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Postal Savings Bank of China (1658.HK) and Bank of China Limited (3988.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	1658.HK	3988.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	1.06	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.19	1.53	-1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.18	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.04	1.42	-1.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.07	3.56	-3.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

1658.HK vs. 3988.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1658.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the 3988.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1658.HK and 3988.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	1658.HK	3988.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03	1.06	-1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	1.14	-0.98
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.32	-0.12

Drawdowns

1658.HK vs. 3988.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1658.HK drawdown since its inception was -44.28%, smaller than the maximum 3988.HK drawdown of -66.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1658.HK and 3988.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	1658.HK	3988.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.28%	-66.11%	+21.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.39%	-12.61%	-2.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.05%	-13.24%	-19.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.28%	-17.25%	-27.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.24%	-1.13%	-11.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.13%	-19.78%	+5.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.67%	4.96%	+3.71%

Volatility

1658.HK vs. 3988.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Postal Savings Bank of China (1658.HK) is 3.24%, while Bank of China Limited (3988.HK) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that 1658.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3988.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	1658.HK	3988.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.24%	4.67%	-1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.62%	12.16%	-0.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.65%	16.88%	+2.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.45%	18.64%	+9.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.56%	18.95%	+8.61%

Dividends

1658.HK vs. 3988.HK - Dividend Comparison

1658.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than 3988.HK's 2.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
1658.HK Postal Savings Bank of China	2.70%	2.30%	9.73%	7.50%	5.98%	4.58%	5.24%	4.15%	4.24%	2.08%	0.00%	0.00%
3988.HK Bank of China Limited	2.29%	8.56%	6.53%	8.45%	9.12%	8.46%	7.90%	6.33%	6.26%	5.01%	6.02%	6.86%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 1658.HK and 3988.HK in my portfolio?

1658.HK and 3988.HK have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.