1164.HK vs. URA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

1164.HK (CGN Mining Company Limited) is a stock, while URA (Global X Uranium ETF) is Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Over the past 10 years, 1164.HK returned 22.36%/yr vs 15.30%/yr for URA. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

1164.HK vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in CGN Mining Company Limited (1164.HK) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

1164.HK is traded in HKD, while URA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the URA values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, 1164.HK has outperformed URA with an annualized return of 22.36%, while URA has yielded a comparatively lower 15.30% annualized return.

1164.HK

• 1D: -11.97%
• 1M: -20.36%
• YTD: -0.00%
• 6M: -9.12%
• 1Y: 44.18%
• 3Y*: 51.12%
• 5Y*: 34.92%
• 10Y*: 22.36%

URA

• 1D: -9.89%
• 1M: -22.24%
• YTD: 6.73%
• 6M: -0.30%
• 1Y: 42.90%
• 3Y*: 33.72%
• 5Y*: 19.07%
• 10Y*: 15.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1164.HK vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
1164.HK CGN Mining Company Limited	-0.00%	86.74%	-3.29%	112.35%	3.85%	118.30%	22.57%	28.93%	-61.75%	10.40%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	6.73%	67.50%	-1.09%	46.23%	-11.17%	58.43%	40.70%	-4.05%	-21.94%	20.28%

Correlation

The correlation between 1164.HK and URA is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2010	0.18

The correlation between 1164.HK and URA shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.19 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

1164.HK vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1164.HK

1164.HK Risk / Return Rank: 63
1164.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
1164.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
1164.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 60
1164.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
1164.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 65

URA

URA Risk / Return Rank: 27
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 25
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1164.HK vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CGN Mining Company Limited (1164.HK) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	1164.HK	URA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	0.84	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.39	1.44	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.17	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	1.52	-0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.71	3.20	-0.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

1164.HK vs. URA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1164.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is comparable to the URA Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1164.HK and URA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	1164.HK	URA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	0.84	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.44	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36	0.41	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	-0.07	+0.21

Drawdowns

1164.HK vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1164.HK drawdown since its inception was -88.43%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1164.HK and URA.

Drawdown Indicators

	1164.HK	URA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.43%	-93.55%	+5.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.25%	-28.35%	-12.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.99%	-37.80%	-21.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.99%	-37.80%	-21.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.13%	-61.43%	-13.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.25%	-48.27%	+7.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.12%	-74.99%	+21.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.12%	13.44%	+3.68%

Volatility

1164.HK vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

CGN Mining Company Limited (1164.HK) has a higher volatility of 17.91% compared to Global X Uranium ETF (URA) at 16.86%. This indicates that 1164.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	1164.HK	URA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.91%	16.86%	+1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.25%	39.56%	+6.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.75%	51.18%	+19.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	68.46%	43.82%	+24.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.23%	37.83%	+25.40%

Dividends

1164.HK vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

1164.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than URA's 4.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
1164.HK CGN Mining Company Limited	0.23%	0.23%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.64%	2.78%	1.64%	0.83%	3.17%	0.00%	0.00%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	4.60%	4.88%	2.86%	6.07%	0.76%	5.84%	1.69%	1.66%	0.44%	2.03%	7.28%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 1164.HK and URA in my portfolio?

1164.HK and URA have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.