1128.HK vs. BABA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

1128.HK (Wynn Macau Ltd) and BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — 1128.HK in Resorts & Casinos, BABA in Internet Retail. Over the past 10 years, 1128.HK returned -4.55%/yr vs 5.84%/yr for BABA. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

1128.HK vs. BABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Wynn Macau Ltd (1128.HK) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

1128.HK is traded in HKD, while BABA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BABA values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1128.HK achieves a 4.28% return, which is significantly higher than BABA's -12.63% return. Over the past 10 years, 1128.HK has underperformed BABA with an annualized return of -4.55%, while BABA has yielded a comparatively higher 5.84% annualized return.

1128.HK

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: 10.62%
• YTD: 4.28%
• 6M: -5.28%
• 1Y: 18.86%
• 3Y*: -1.51%
• 5Y*: -12.72%
• 10Y*: -4.55%

BABA

• 1D: -2.78%
• 1M: -4.51%
• YTD: -12.63%
• 6M: -19.00%
• 1Y: 12.38%
• 3Y*: 16.70%
• 5Y*: -9.18%
• 10Y*: 5.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1128.HK vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
1128.HK Wynn Macau Ltd	4.28%	17.14%	-14.13%	-26.09%	36.58%	-51.08%	-32.19%	18.86%	-27.46%	107.95%
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited	-12.63%	76.14%	11.19%	-10.84%	-25.72%	-48.68%	9.23%	53.92%	-20.33%	97.88%

Correlation

The correlation between 1128.HK and BABA is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2014	0.22

The correlation between 1128.HK and BABA shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

1128.HK vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1128.HK

1128.HK Risk / Return Rank: 58
1128.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
1128.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
1128.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 56
1128.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
1128.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 55

BABA

BABA Risk / Return Rank: 48
BABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
BABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
BABA Omega Ratio Rank: 45
BABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
BABA Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1128.HK vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wynn Macau Ltd (1128.HK) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	1128.HK	BABA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.65	0.28	+0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	0.80	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.09	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.73	0.34	+0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.32	0.67	+0.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

1128.HK vs. BABA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1128.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is higher than the BABA Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1128.HK and BABA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	1128.HK	BABA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65	0.28	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.26	-0.18	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.10	0.14	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.00	0.08	-0.07

Drawdowns

1128.HK vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1128.HK drawdown since its inception was -89.34%, which is greater than BABA's maximum drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1128.HK and BABA.

Drawdown Indicators

	1128.HK	BABA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.34%	-79.83%	-9.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.48%	-36.34%	+9.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.07%	-36.34%	-5.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-77.10%	-72.17%	-4.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.34%	-79.83%	-9.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.44%	-57.30%	-19.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.66%	-37.41%	-8.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.47%	18.42%	-3.95%

Volatility

1128.HK vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wynn Macau Ltd (1128.HK) is 7.15%, while Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a volatility of 14.76%. This indicates that 1128.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	1128.HK	BABA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.15%	14.76%	-7.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.46%	29.00%	-12.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.99%	43.77%	-13.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.39%	51.28%	-1.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.40%	43.30%	+2.10%

Dividends

1128.HK vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison

1128.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.86%, more than BABA's 1.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
1128.HK Wynn Macau Ltd	6.86%	6.23%	2.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.69%	6.91%	2.55%	4.86%	11.59%
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited	1.57%	1.36%	1.96%	1.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 1128.HK and BABA in my portfolio?

1128.HK and BABA have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.