PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
10AJ.DE vs. IQQ7.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

10AJ.DE vs. IQQ7.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE) and iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ7.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 10AJ.DE achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly lower than IQQ7.DE's 14.24% return.


10AJ.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
-2.40%
YTD
7.96%
6M
7.43%
1Y
9.54%
3Y*
5.94%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*

IQQ7.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
14.24%
6M
13.41%
1Y
12.16%
3Y*
7.46%
5Y*
4.46%
10Y*
4.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

10AJ.DE vs. IQQ7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
10AJ.DE
Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist
7.96%-1.85%5.52%6.85%-20.55%36.79%-16.96%23.88%1.63%
IQQ7.DE
iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF
14.24%-9.38%10.73%9.18%-19.53%54.15%-19.20%24.58%6.96%

Correlation

The correlation between 10AJ.DE and IQQ7.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018

0.87

The correlation between 10AJ.DE and IQQ7.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

10AJ.DE vs. IQQ7.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

10AJ.DE
10AJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
10AJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
10AJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
10AJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
10AJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
10AJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQ7.DE
IQQ7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IQQ7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQ7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQ7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQ7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQ7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

10AJ.DE vs. IQQ7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE) and iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


10AJ.DEIQQ7.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.17

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

1.96

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.94

4.13

-0.19

10AJ.DE vs. IQQ7.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 10AJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the IQQ7.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 10AJ.DE and IQQ7.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


10AJ.DEIQQ7.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

0.94

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.25

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.22

0.00

Drawdowns

10AJ.DE vs. IQQ7.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 10AJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.62%, smaller than the maximum IQQ7.DE drawdown of -68.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 10AJ.DE and IQQ7.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


10AJ.DEIQQ7.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.62%

-68.97%

+26.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-6.13%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.52%

-24.01%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.01%

-31.10%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.63%

-5.01%

-1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.13%

-14.82%

+2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

2.92%

-0.51%

Volatility

10AJ.DE vs. IQQ7.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE) is 2.70%, while iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQ7.DE) has a volatility of 3.27%. This indicates that 10AJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQ7.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


10AJ.DEIQQ7.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

3.27%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.38%

8.99%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.14%

12.78%

-1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.60%

17.35%

-2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.10%

20.09%

-2.99%

10AJ.DE vs. IQQ7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

10AJ.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQ7.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

10AJ.DE vs. IQQ7.DE - Dividend Comparison

10AJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, less than IQQ7.DE's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
10AJ.DE
Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist
2.77%2.99%2.94%2.98%3.23%2.13%3.10%2.92%2.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IQQ7.DE
iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF
2.98%3.36%2.99%3.21%3.87%2.04%3.54%3.11%4.53%3.38%3.34%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, 10AJ.DE and IQQ7.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, 10AJ.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

10AJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IQQ7.DE.

10AJ.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed, while IQQ7.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT United States Dividend+. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for 10AJ.DE and 0.40% for IQQ7.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 10AJ.DE and IQQ7.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer