10AJ.DE vs. H4ZL.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

10AJ.DE (Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist) and H4ZL.DE (HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD) are both REIT funds tracking the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed, from Amundi and HSBC respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 10AJ.DE returned 1.87%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for H4ZL.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.24% expense ratio.

Performance

10AJ.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 10AJ.DE achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly higher than H4ZL.DE's 6.32% return.

10AJ.DE

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -2.40%
• YTD: 7.96%
• 6M: 7.43%
• 1Y: 9.54%
• 3Y*: 5.94%
• 5Y*: 1.87%
• 10Y*: —

H4ZL.DE

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -2.45%
• YTD: 6.32%
• 6M: 5.97%
• 1Y: 6.50%
• 3Y*: 3.13%
• 5Y*: 0.30%
• 10Y*: 2.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

10AJ.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
10AJ.DE Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist	7.96%	-1.85%	5.52%	6.85%	-20.55%	36.79%	-16.96%	23.88%	1.63%
H4ZL.DE HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD	6.32%	-4.65%	2.27%	6.12%	-20.22%	36.90%	-16.99%	23.91%	2.14%

Correlation

The correlation between 10AJ.DE and H4ZL.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018	0.92

The correlation between 10AJ.DE and H4ZL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

10AJ.DE vs. H4ZL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

10AJ.DE

10AJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 25
10AJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
10AJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
10AJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 24
10AJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
10AJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 28

H4ZL.DE

H4ZL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 19
H4ZL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
H4ZL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
H4ZL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 18
H4ZL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
H4ZL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

10AJ.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	10AJ.DE	H4ZL.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	0.59	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	0.88	+0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.11	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	0.84	+0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.94	2.48	+1.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

10AJ.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 10AJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the H4ZL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 10AJ.DE and H4ZL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	10AJ.DE	H4ZL.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	0.59	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	0.02	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.29	-0.08

Drawdowns

10AJ.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 10AJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.62%, roughly equal to the maximum H4ZL.DE drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 10AJ.DE and H4ZL.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	10AJ.DE	H4ZL.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.62%	-41.97%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.89%	-7.82%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.52%	-20.68%	+0.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.01%	-30.45%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.63%	-13.81%	+7.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.13%	-10.80%	-1.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	2.67%	-0.26%

Volatility

10AJ.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE) is 2.70%, while HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that 10AJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H4ZL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	10AJ.DE	H4ZL.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.70%	2.88%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.38%	8.34%	+0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.14%	11.21%	-0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.60%	14.69%	-0.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.10%	16.27%	+0.83%

10AJ.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 10AJ.DE and H4ZL.DE have an expense ratio of 0.24%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

10AJ.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Dividend Comparison

10AJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, while H4ZL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
10AJ.DE Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist	2.77%	2.99%	2.94%	2.98%	3.23%	2.13%	3.10%	2.92%	2.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
H4ZL.DE HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.63%	3.62%	2.19%	3.13%	2.95%	3.29%	3.08%	2.96%	2.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 10AJ.DE and H4ZL.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, 10AJ.DE and H4ZL.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, 10AJ.DE or H4ZL.DE?

Both ETFs have the same 0.24% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 10AJ.DE or H4ZL.DE?

10AJ.DE and H4ZL.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.24% per year.

What is the main difference between 10AJ.DE and H4ZL.DE?

Both ETFs track FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC.