PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
10AJ.DE vs. H4Z7.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

10AJ.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with 10AJ.DE having a 7.96% return and H4Z7.DE slightly lower at 7.83%.


10AJ.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
-2.40%
YTD
7.96%
6M
7.43%
1Y
9.54%
3Y*
5.94%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*

H4Z7.DE

1D
-0.12%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
7.83%
6M
7.26%
1Y
9.73%
3Y*
6.21%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

10AJ.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
10AJ.DE
Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist
7.96%-1.85%5.52%6.85%-13.31%
H4Z7.DE
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
7.83%-1.78%5.80%7.39%-13.07%

Correlation

The correlation between 10AJ.DE and H4Z7.DE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2022

0.97

The correlation between 10AJ.DE and H4Z7.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

10AJ.DE vs. H4Z7.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

10AJ.DE
10AJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
10AJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
10AJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
10AJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
10AJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
10AJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

H4Z7.DE
H4Z7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
H4Z7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4Z7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4Z7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
H4Z7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4Z7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

10AJ.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


10AJ.DEH4Z7.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.15

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

1.23

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.94

3.99

-0.05

10AJ.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 10AJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the H4Z7.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 10AJ.DE and H4Z7.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


10AJ.DEH4Z7.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

0.86

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.08

+0.14

Drawdowns

10AJ.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 10AJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.62%, which is greater than H4Z7.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 10AJ.DE and H4Z7.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


10AJ.DEH4Z7.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.62%

-26.78%

-15.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-7.86%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.52%

-20.13%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.63%

-2.86%

-3.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.13%

-11.53%

-0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

2.42%

-0.01%

Volatility

10AJ.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist (10AJ.DE) is 2.70%, while HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that 10AJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H4Z7.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


10AJ.DEH4Z7.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

2.87%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.38%

8.56%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.14%

11.25%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.60%

14.42%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.10%

14.42%

+2.68%

10AJ.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 10AJ.DE and H4Z7.DE have an expense ratio of 0.24%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

10AJ.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Dividend Comparison

10AJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, while H4Z7.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
10AJ.DE
Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF EUR Dist
2.77%2.99%2.94%2.98%3.23%2.13%3.10%2.92%2.63%
H4Z7.DE
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, 10AJ.DE and H4Z7.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.24% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

10AJ.DE and H4Z7.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.24% per year.

Both ETFs track FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 10AJ.DE and H4Z7.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer