PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
100D.L vs. BRBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

100D.L vs. BRBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) and Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

100D.L is traded in GBp, while BRBS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRBS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 100D.L achieves a 6.04% return, which is significantly higher than BRBS's -9.95% return.


100D.L

1D
0.13%
1M
1.71%
YTD
6.04%
6M
8.26%
1Y
21.31%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*

BRBS

1D
1.23%
1M
-2.64%
YTD
-9.95%
6M
-13.37%
1Y
19.84%
3Y*
-24.92%
5Y*
-23.57%
10Y*
-3.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

100D.L vs. BRBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
100D.L
Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
6.04%25.77%9.32%7.37%4.80%18.00%-11.78%4.12%
BRBS
Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.
-9.95%30.16%8.13%-76.43%-19.29%56.48%-15.12%17.01%

Correlation

The correlation between 100D.L and BRBS is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

100D.L vs. BRBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

100D.L
100D.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
100D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
100D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
100D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
100D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
100D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

BRBS
BRBS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BRBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRBS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
BRBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRBS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

100D.L vs. BRBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) and Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


100D.LBRBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.15

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

1.11

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.06

2.34

+5.73

100D.L vs. BRBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 100D.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the BRBS Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 100D.L and BRBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


100D.LBRBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

0.69

+1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

-0.52

+1.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

-0.13

+0.66

Drawdowns

100D.L vs. BRBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 100D.L drawdown since its inception was -34.63%, smaller than the maximum BRBS drawdown of -86.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 100D.L and BRBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


100D.LBRBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.63%

-86.98%

+52.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-17.99%

+9.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.06%

-76.82%

+63.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.06%

-86.98%

+73.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.00%

-77.17%

+73.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-46.15%

+41.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

8.51%

-5.87%

Volatility

100D.L vs. BRBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) is 3.98%, while Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS) has a volatility of 6.14%. This indicates that 100D.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


100D.LBRBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

6.14%

-2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.52%

17.02%

-7.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.96%

28.84%

-17.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.88%

45.89%

-33.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.92%

42.06%

-26.14%

Dividends

100D.L vs. BRBS - Dividend Comparison

100D.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than BRBS's 25.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
100D.L
Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
3.57%3.78%4.17%3.90%3.80%3.39%3.11%4.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BRBS
Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.
25.91%5.85%0.00%8.09%3.90%2.43%2.40%2.04%3.13%1.88%2.07%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


100D.L and BRBS have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 100D.L and BRBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer