0P00007069.TO vs. FDETX
Compare and contrast key facts about RBC Select Growth Portfolio A (0P00007069.TO) and Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O (FDETX).
0P00007069.TO is managed by RBC Global Asset Management.. It was launched on Dec 11, 1986. FDETX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 30, 1985.
Performance
0P00007069.TO vs. FDETX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
0P00007069.TO vs. FDETX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0P00007069.TO RBC Select Growth Portfolio A | 0.42% | 12.46% | 14.83% | 10.06% | -13.00% | 12.23% | 10.40% | 15.40% | -5.23% |
FDETX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O | -1.95% | 27.60% | 27.07% | 24.20% | -8.00% | 25.32% | 9.12% | 31.39% | -10.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 0P00007069.TO achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly higher than FDETX's -1.95% return.
0P00007069.TO
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- -4.31%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 13.14%
- 3Y*
- 11.08%
- 5Y*
- 6.15%
- 10Y*
- —
FDETX
- 1D
- 3.24%
- 1M
- -5.25%
- YTD
- -1.95%
- 6M
- 3.03%
- 1Y
- 27.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.78%
- 5Y*
- 14.97%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
0P00007069.TO vs. FDETX - Expense Ratio Comparison
0P00007069.TO has a 2.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FDETX's 0.56% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
0P00007069.TO vs. FDETX — Risk / Return Rank
0P00007069.TO
FDETX
0P00007069.TO vs. FDETX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Select Growth Portfolio A (0P00007069.TO) and Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O (FDETX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 0P00007069.TO | FDETX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 1.52 | -0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 2.14 | -0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.34 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 2.29 | -0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.20 | 10.41 | -4.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 0P00007069.TO | FDETX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 1.52 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.85 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.63 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between 0P00007069.TO and FDETX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
0P00007069.TO vs. FDETX - Dividend Comparison
0P00007069.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than FDETX's 10.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0P00007069.TO RBC Select Growth Portfolio A | 3.66% | 3.67% | 2.93% | 1.76% | 0.86% | 2.62% | 0.77% | 0.50% | 2.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDETX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O | 10.55% | 10.34% | 8.95% | 4.39% | 5.66% | 5.63% | 4.47% | 7.46% | 15.81% | 5.34% | 2.92% | 5.97% |
Drawdowns
0P00007069.TO vs. FDETX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 0P00007069.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.48%, smaller than the maximum FDETX drawdown of -66.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0P00007069.TO and FDETX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 0P00007069.TO | FDETX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.48% | -66.86% | +42.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.00% | -12.42% | +3.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.81% | -21.72% | +2.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.90% | -6.71% | +1.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -11.26% | +7.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 2.73% | -0.54% |
Volatility
0P00007069.TO vs. FDETX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RBC Select Growth Portfolio A (0P00007069.TO) is 4.90%, while Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class O (FDETX) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that 0P00007069.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDETX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 0P00007069.TO | FDETX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 5.73% | -0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.54% | 10.07% | -2.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.87% | 18.62% | -6.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.70% | 17.62% | -7.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.48% | 18.85% | -7.37% |