0B2.DE vs. RMD
0B2.DE (BAWAG Group AG) and RMD (ResMed Inc.) are both stocks. 0B2.DE operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while RMD operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, 0B2.DE returned 35.83%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for RMD. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
0B2.DE vs. RMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
0B2.DE is traded in EUR, while RMD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RMD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 0B2.DE achieves a 23.06% return, which is significantly higher than RMD's -17.97% return.
0B2.DE
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 4.04%
- YTD
- 23.06%
- 6M
- 34.68%
- 1Y
- 46.26%
- 3Y*
- 62.56%
- 5Y*
- 35.83%
- 10Y*
- —
RMD
- 1D
- 4.07%
- 1M
- -5.62%
- YTD
- -17.97%
- 6M
- -22.12%
- 1Y
- -22.81%
- 3Y*
- -5.99%
- 5Y*
- 0.71%
- 10Y*
- 13.52%
0B2.DE vs. RMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0B2.DE BAWAG Group AG | 23.06% | 70.86% | 82.66% | 6.44% | -1.75% | 40.29% | -5.03% | 9.08% | -12.76% |
RMD ResMed Inc. | -17.97% | -6.35% | 43.04% | -19.05% | -14.48% | 32.64% | 26.93% | 40.96% | 22.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between 0B2.DE and RMD is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2018 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
0B2.DE vs. RMD — Risk / Return Rank
0B2.DE
RMD
0B2.DE vs. RMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BAWAG Group AG (0B2.DE) and ResMed Inc. (RMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 0B2.DE | RMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.85 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | -0.62 | +3.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.04 | -1.46 | +11.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 0B2.DE | RMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | -0.97 | +2.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.45 | 0.02 | +1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.48 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
0B2.DE vs. RMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 0B2.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.63%, which is greater than RMD's maximum drawdown of -48.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0B2.DE and RMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 0B2.DE | RMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.63% | -48.54% | -5.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.89% | -36.99% | +21.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.84% | -38.44% | +18.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.88% | -48.54% | +17.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.19% | -32.93% | +30.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.33% | -13.46% | +3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.73% | 15.63% | -10.90% |
Volatility
0B2.DE vs. RMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BAWAG Group AG (0B2.DE) is 7.37%, while ResMed Inc. (RMD) has a volatility of 10.56%. This indicates that 0B2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 0B2.DE | RMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 10.56% | -3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.15% | 19.42% | +1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.45% | 23.61% | +3.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.31% | 30.75% | +2.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.10% | 31.67% | +9.43% |
Dividends
0B2.DE vs. RMD - Dividend Comparison
0B2.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than RMD's 1.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0B2.DE BAWAG Group AG | 4.12% | 4.28% | 6.21% | 7.69% | 6.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RMD ResMed Inc. | 1.24% | 0.94% | 0.88% | 1.07% | 0.83% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.98% | 1.26% | 1.61% | 2.03% | 2.16% |
Financials
0B2.DE vs. RMD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BAWAG Group AG and ResMed Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
0B2.DE and RMD have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for 0B2.DE and RMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer