0883.HK vs. SMH
0883.HK (CNOOC Ltd) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, 0883.HK returned 18.72%/yr vs 37.62%/yr for SMH. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
0883.HK vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
0883.HK is traded in HKD, while SMH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 0883.HK achieves a 19.57% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 73.30% return. Over the past 10 years, 0883.HK has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 18.72%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.62% annualized return.
0883.HK
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -3.60%
- YTD
- 19.57%
- 6M
- 21.97%
- 1Y
- 41.30%
- 3Y*
- 39.61%
- 5Y*
- 34.47%
- 10Y*
- 18.72%
SMH
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- 7.23%
- YTD
- 73.30%
- 6M
- 76.77%
- 1Y
- 141.57%
- 3Y*
- 60.06%
- 5Y*
- 38.68%
- 10Y*
- 37.62%
0883.HK vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0883.HK CNOOC Ltd | 19.57% | 19.77% | 57.91% | 44.90% | 46.98% | 19.64% | -40.48% | 13.63% | 12.79% | 21.28% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 73.30% | 49.46% | 38.38% | 73.35% | -33.42% | 42.90% | 54.84% | 63.58% | -8.85% | 39.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between 0883.HK and SMH is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2007 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
0883.HK vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
0883.HK
SMH
0883.HK vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CNOOC Ltd (0883.HK) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 0883.HK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.60 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 9.26 | -6.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.00 | 33.80 | -26.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
0883.HK vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 0883.HK drawdown since its inception was -74.17%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -62.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0883.HK and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 0883.HK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.17% | -62.38% | -11.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.17% | -14.76% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.80% | -36.08% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.80% | -44.94% | +14.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.59% | -44.94% | -11.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.50% | -2.83% | -13.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.10% | -11.95% | -12.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.43% | 4.04% | +2.39% |
Volatility
0883.HK vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CNOOC Ltd (0883.HK) is 8.11%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 16.28%. This indicates that 0883.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 0883.HK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.11% | 16.28% | -8.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.22% | 27.74% | -3.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.40% | 33.22% | -4.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.79% | 35.44% | -5.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.86% | 32.79% | -0.93% |
Dividends
0883.HK vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
0883.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0883.HK CNOOC Ltd | 5.14% | 6.53% | 7.32% | 10.31% | 18.84% | 6.85% | 9.05% | 5.63% | 4.96% | 3.83% | 3.81% | 7.06% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
0883.HK and SMH have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for 0883.HK and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer