PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0855.HK vs. 1530.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

0855.HK vs. 1530.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in China Water Affairs Group Ltd (0855.HK) and 3SBio Inc (1530.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0855.HK achieves a -14.62% return, which is significantly higher than 1530.HK's -33.46% return. Over the past 10 years, 0855.HK has underperformed 1530.HK with an annualized return of 5.05%, while 1530.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 8.77% annualized return.


0855.HK

1D
-2.26%
1M
-7.30%
YTD
-14.62%
6M
-15.27%
1Y
-25.95%
3Y*
-2.77%
5Y*
-0.95%
10Y*
5.05%

1530.HK

1D
-0.86%
1M
-16.33%
YTD
-33.46%
6M
-38.40%
1Y
-22.02%
3Y*
33.14%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
8.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0855.HK vs. 1530.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0855.HK
China Water Affairs Group Ltd
-14.62%7.38%27.04%-29.66%-40.78%91.69%9.18%-26.88%22.33%44.17%
1530.HK
3SBio Inc
-33.46%300.89%-15.95%-8.19%31.63%-8.06%-30.00%0.60%-34.29%103.18%

Correlation

The correlation between 0855.HK and 1530.HK is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2015

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0855.HK vs. 1530.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0855.HK
0855.HK Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
0855.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0855.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
0855.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
0855.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
0855.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

1530.HK
1530.HK Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
1530.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1530.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
1530.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
1530.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
1530.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0855.HK vs. 1530.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Water Affairs Group Ltd (0855.HK) and 3SBio Inc (1530.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


0855.HK1530.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.99

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

-0.39

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.63

-0.78

-0.85

0855.HK vs. 1530.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0855.HK Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the 1530.HK Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0855.HK and 1530.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

0855.HK vs. 1530.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0855.HK drawdown since its inception was -88.76%, which is greater than 1530.HK's maximum drawdown of -78.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0855.HK and 1530.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0855.HK1530.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.76%

-78.63%

-10.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.13%

-57.58%

+25.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.93%

-57.58%

+15.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.13%

-60.61%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.13%

-78.63%

+14.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.59%

-55.18%

+2.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.22%

-44.09%

+5.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.08%

28.67%

-12.59%

Volatility

0855.HK vs. 1530.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for China Water Affairs Group Ltd (0855.HK) is 6.75%, while 3SBio Inc (1530.HK) has a volatility of 18.60%. This indicates that 0855.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 1530.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0855.HK1530.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

18.60%

-11.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.35%

41.28%

-23.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.93%

64.15%

-38.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.28%

54.25%

-16.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.33%

50.25%

-15.92%

Dividends

0855.HK vs. 1530.HK - Dividend Comparison

0855.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, more than 1530.HK's 1.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0855.HK
China Water Affairs Group Ltd
6.48%5.38%5.48%7.93%2.79%2.86%5.12%5.15%3.22%2.55%1.78%1.88%
1530.HK
3SBio Inc
1.55%1.03%4.11%1.33%2.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

0855.HK vs. 1530.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Water Affairs Group Ltd and 3SBio Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in HKD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


0855.HK and 1530.HK have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0855.HK and 1530.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer