PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0506.HK vs. 0857.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

0506.HK vs. 0857.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in China Foods Ltd (0506.HK) and PetroChina Co Ltd Class H (0857.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0506.HK achieves a -16.22% return, which is significantly lower than 0857.HK's 22.22% return. Over the past 10 years, 0506.HK has underperformed 0857.HK with an annualized return of 7.25%, while 0857.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 12.39% annualized return.


0506.HK

1D
-1.71%
1M
11.65%
6M
-16.03%
YTD
-16.22%
1Y
10.85%
3Y*
10.76%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
7.25%
ALL TIME*
1.22%

0857.HK

1D
-2.07%
1M
17.22%
6M
10.37%
YTD
22.22%
1Y
37.80%
3Y*
28.73%
5Y*
35.48%
10Y*
12.39%
ALL TIME*
4.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HK$10.35MHK$10.40MHK$11.93M
HK$849.99MHK$822.73MHK$1.10B

0506.HK vs. 0857.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0506.HK
China Foods Ltd
-16.22%83.36%-10.34%10.66%-3.74%24.27%-14.13%6.62%-37.06%72.46%
0857.HK
PetroChina Co Ltd Class H
22.22%46.96%27.73%56.92%13.08%55.95%-35.38%-17.02%-9.64%-4.43%

Correlation

The correlation between 0506.HK and 0857.HK is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2006

0.27

The correlation between 0506.HK and 0857.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0506.HK vs. 0857.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

0506.HK
0506.HK Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
0506.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0506.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
0506.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
0506.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
0506.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

0857.HK
0857.HK Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
0857.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0857.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
0857.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
0857.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
0857.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

0506.HK vs. 0857.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Foods Ltd (0506.HK) and PetroChina Co Ltd Class H (0857.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


0506.HK0857.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.25

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.32

1.43

-1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.55

4.28

-3.72

0506.HK vs. 0857.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0506.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the 0857.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0506.HK and 0857.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

0506.HK vs. 0857.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0506.HK drawdown since its inception was -83.70%, roughly equal to the maximum 0857.HK drawdown of -84.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0506.HK and 0857.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0506.HK0857.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.70%

-84.31%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.61%

-27.36%

-7.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.61%

-36.54%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.42%

-36.54%

-4.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.53%

-64.64%

+12.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.87%

-14.86%

-19.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.50%

-50.60%

+1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.02%

9.09%

+10.93%

Volatility

0506.HK vs. 0857.HK - Volatility Comparison

China Foods Ltd (0506.HK) has a higher volatility of 9.14% compared to PetroChina Co Ltd Class H (0857.HK) at 8.43%. This indicates that 0506.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 0857.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0506.HK0857.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.14%

8.43%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.42%

24.17%

-4.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.06%

28.91%

+7.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.31%

30.19%

+1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.21%

29.73%

+4.48%

Dividends

0506.HK vs. 0857.HK - Dividend Comparison

0506.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, less than 0857.HK's 5.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0506.HK
China Foods Ltd
5.13%3.82%6.36%4.52%4.46%3.48%1.89%1.30%0.84%22.80%0.67%0.00%
0857.HK
PetroChina Co Ltd Class H
5.32%6.13%8.07%9.14%9.71%7.57%5.16%3.81%1.15%1.24%0.94%3.89%

Financials

0506.HK vs. 0857.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Foods Ltd and PetroChina Co Ltd Class H. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in HKD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


0506.HK and 0857.HK have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0506.HK and 0857.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer