PortfoliosLab logo
0857.HK vs. 0338.HK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between 0857.HK and 0338.HK is -0.50. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

0857.HK vs. 0338.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PetroChina Co Ltd Class H (0857.HK) and Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co Ltd Class H (0338.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

0857.HK:

-0.31

0338.HK:

0.16

Sortino Ratio

0857.HK:

-0.19

0338.HK:

0.66

Omega Ratio

0857.HK:

0.97

0338.HK:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

0857.HK:

-0.25

0338.HK:

0.15

Martin Ratio

0857.HK:

-0.44

0338.HK:

0.82

Ulcer Index

0857.HK:

23.63%

0338.HK:

13.58%

Daily Std Dev

0857.HK:

33.77%

0338.HK:

34.94%

Max Drawdown

0857.HK:

-83.89%

0338.HK:

-87.53%

Current Drawdown

0857.HK:

-32.62%

0338.HK:

-70.04%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

0857.HK:

HK$1.55T

0338.HK:

HK$26.61B

EPS

0857.HK:

HK$0.86

0338.HK:

-HK$0.02

PE Ratio

0857.HK:

6.30

0338.HK:

60.00

PEG Ratio

0857.HK:

0.17

0338.HK:

0.00

PS Ratio

0857.HK:

0.54

0338.HK:

0.31

PB Ratio

0857.HK:

0.65

0338.HK:

0.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

0857.HK:

HK$2.88T

0338.HK:

HK$85.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

0857.HK:

HK$656.09B

0338.HK:

HK$14.86B

EBITDA (TTM)

0857.HK:

HK$64.46B

0338.HK:

HK$209.30M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0857.HK achieves a -0.00% return, which is significantly lower than 0338.HK's -0.00% return. Over the past 10 years, 0857.HK has outperformed 0338.HK with an annualized return of 0.90%, while 0338.HK has yielded a comparatively lower -7.36% annualized return.


0857.HK

YTD

-0.00%

1M

15.72%

6M

6.82%

1Y

-14.18%

5Y*

29.32%

10Y*

0.90%

0338.HK

YTD

-0.00%

1M

2.56%

6M

-4.76%

1Y

2.56%

5Y*

-6.45%

10Y*

-7.36%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

0857.HK vs. 0338.HK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0857.HK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of 0857.HK is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of 0857.HK is 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of 0857.HK is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of 0857.HK is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of 0857.HK is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of 0857.HK is 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

0338.HK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of 0338.HK is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of 0338.HK is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of 0338.HK is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of 0338.HK is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of 0338.HK is 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of 0338.HK is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

0857.HK vs. 0338.HK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PetroChina Co Ltd Class H (0857.HK) and Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co Ltd Class H (0338.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current 0857.HK Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the 0338.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0857.HK and 0338.HK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

0857.HK vs. 0338.HK - Dividend Comparison

0857.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.07%, while 0338.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
0857.HK
PetroChina Co Ltd Class H
8.07%8.07%9.14%9.71%7.57%9.66%2.78%2.19%1.05%0.94%3.89%4.75%
0338.HK
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co Ltd Class H
0.00%0.00%0.00%8.84%6.76%7.94%12.09%10.70%6.45%2.81%0.00%2.78%

Drawdowns

0857.HK vs. 0338.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0857.HK drawdown since its inception was -83.89%, roughly equal to the maximum 0338.HK drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0857.HK and 0338.HK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

0857.HK vs. 0338.HK - Volatility Comparison

PetroChina Co Ltd Class H (0857.HK) has a higher volatility of 19.49% compared to Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co Ltd Class H (0338.HK) at 15.10%. This indicates that 0857.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 0338.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

0857.HK vs. 0338.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PetroChina Co Ltd Class H and Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co Ltd Class H. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B20212022202320242025
753.11B
19.52B
(0857.HK) Total Revenue
(0338.HK) Total Revenue
Values in HKD except per share items

0857.HK vs. 0338.HK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PetroChina Co Ltd Class H and Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co Ltd Class H over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
21.1%
17.0%
(0857.HK) Gross Margin
(0338.HK) Gross Margin
0857.HK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PetroChina Co Ltd Class H reported a gross profit of 158.84B and revenue of 753.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.

0338.HK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co Ltd Class H reported a gross profit of 3.31B and revenue of 19.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.0%.

0857.HK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PetroChina Co Ltd Class H reported an operating income of 63.99B and revenue of 753.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.5%.

0338.HK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co Ltd Class H reported an operating income of -114.48M and revenue of 19.52B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.6%.

0857.HK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PetroChina Co Ltd Class H reported a net income of 46.81B and revenue of 753.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.

0338.HK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co Ltd Class H reported a net income of -89.84M and revenue of 19.52B, resulting in a net margin of -0.5%.