PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
010130.KS vs. 1258.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

010130.KS vs. 1258.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a ₩10,000 investment in Korea Zinc Inc (010130.KS) and China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd (1258.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

010130.KS is traded in KRW, while 1258.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 1258.HK values have been converted to KRW using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 010130.KS achieves a -17.48% return, which is significantly lower than 1258.HK's -14.43% return. Over the past 10 years, 010130.KS has outperformed 1258.HK with an annualized return of 46.93%, while 1258.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 37.22% annualized return.


010130.KS

1D
-3.82%
1M
-21.19%
YTD
-17.48%
6M
-20.85%
1Y
30.70%
3Y*
49.65%
5Y*
64.05%
10Y*
46.93%

1258.HK

1D
3.87%
1M
-10.35%
YTD
-14.43%
6M
-14.04%
1Y
84.32%
3Y*
59.73%
5Y*
39.92%
10Y*
37.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

010130.KS vs. 1258.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
010130.KS
Korea Zinc Inc
-17.48%34.58%165.90%23.69%70.85%103.94%47.74%46.12%16.66%30.44%
1258.HK
China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd
-14.43%187.22%21.18%39.81%47.99%58.06%18.88%1.27%-4.30%36.56%

Correlation

The correlation between 010130.KS and 1258.HK is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2012

0.14

The correlation between 010130.KS and 1258.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

010130.KS vs. 1258.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

010130.KS
010130.KS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
010130.KS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
010130.KS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
010130.KS Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
010130.KS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
010130.KS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

1258.HK
1258.HK Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
1258.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1258.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
1258.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
1258.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
1258.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

010130.KS vs. 1258.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Korea Zinc Inc (010130.KS) and China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd (1258.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


010130.KS1258.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.23

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

2.18

-1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.71

5.36

-3.64

010130.KS vs. 1258.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 010130.KS Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the 1258.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 010130.KS and 1258.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

010130.KS vs. 1258.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 010130.KS drawdown since its inception was -77.23%, which is greater than 1258.HK's maximum drawdown of -69.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 010130.KS and 1258.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


010130.KS1258.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.23%

-69.29%

-7.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.89%

-40.02%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.21%

-45.12%

-20.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.21%

-45.12%

-20.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.21%

-53.86%

-11.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.65%

-30.13%

-18.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.37%

-28.42%

+13.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.71%

16.06%

+4.65%

Volatility

010130.KS vs. 1258.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Korea Zinc Inc (010130.KS) is 18.52%, while China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd (1258.HK) has a volatility of 25.10%. This indicates that 010130.KS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 1258.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


010130.KS1258.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.52%

25.10%

-6.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.72%

49.73%

+5.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.31%

67.15%

+8.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.91%

54.55%

+16.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.59%

57.51%

+3.08%

Dividends

010130.KS vs. 1258.HK - Dividend Comparison

010130.KS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than 1258.HK's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
010130.KS
Korea Zinc Inc
2.31%2.28%17.40%30.12%35.46%39.14%37.36%32.94%25.43%20.28%17.89%18.12%
1258.HK
China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd
2.84%2.28%4.43%4.31%7.48%3.59%2.73%3.61%2.45%0.00%0.00%1.30%

Financials

010130.KS vs. 1258.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Korea Zinc Inc and China Nonferrous Mining Corp Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. 010130.KS values in KRW, 1258.HK values in HKD

Frequently Asked Questions


010130.KS and 1258.HK have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 010130.KS and 1258.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer