PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0012.HK vs. GMG.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

0012.HK vs. GMG.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Henderson Land (0012.HK) and Goodman Group (GMG.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0012.HK is traded in HKD, while GMG.AX is traded in AUD. To make them comparable, the GMG.AX values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0012.HK achieves a -1.76% return, which is significantly lower than GMG.AX's 8.10% return. Over the past 10 years, 0012.HK has underperformed GMG.AX with an annualized return of 7.04%, while GMG.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.00% annualized return.


0012.HK

1D
0.97%
1M
-17.82%
YTD
-1.76%
6M
-6.16%
1Y
11.10%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
-0.54%
10Y*
7.04%

GMG.AX

1D
2.15%
1M
-2.20%
YTD
8.10%
6M
14.71%
1Y
0.95%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
8.34%
10Y*
18.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0012.HK vs. GMG.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0012.HK
Henderson Land
-1.76%28.27%5.75%-4.71%-12.83%15.35%-16.23%23.98%-5.03%55.92%
GMG.AX
Goodman Group
8.10%-5.24%27.92%47.60%-37.47%34.75%57.28%27.27%17.51%33.18%

Correlation

The correlation between 0012.HK and GMG.AX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2012

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0012.HK vs. GMG.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0012.HK
0012.HK Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
0012.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0012.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
0012.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
0012.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
0012.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

GMG.AX
GMG.AX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GMG.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMG.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMG.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GMG.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMG.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0012.HK vs. GMG.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Henderson Land (0012.HK) and Goodman Group (GMG.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


0012.HKGMG.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.03

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

0.04

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.44

0.08

+1.35

0012.HK vs. GMG.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0012.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is higher than the GMG.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0012.HK and GMG.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

0012.HK vs. GMG.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0012.HK drawdown since its inception was -70.51%, which is greater than GMG.AX's maximum drawdown of -50.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0012.HK and GMG.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0012.HKGMG.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.51%

-50.01%

-20.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.75%

-25.98%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.91%

-38.94%

+12.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.09%

-48.54%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.69%

-50.01%

+2.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.00%

-12.56%

-9.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.68%

-11.41%

-7.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.82%

11.35%

-3.53%

Volatility

0012.HK vs. GMG.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Henderson Land (0012.HK) is 5.77%, while Goodman Group (GMG.AX) has a volatility of 8.47%. This indicates that 0012.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMG.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0012.HKGMG.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.77%

8.47%

-2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.63%

23.94%

-4.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.26%

28.56%

-1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.61%

29.92%

-2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.13%

29.31%

-4.18%

Dividends

0012.HK vs. GMG.AX - Dividend Comparison

0012.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, more than GMG.AX's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0012.HK
Henderson Land
4.68%6.40%7.63%7.48%6.61%5.42%5.95%4.71%4.15%2.93%4.47%3.30%
GMG.AX
Goodman Group
0.95%0.97%0.42%1.19%1.73%1.13%1.59%2.24%2.75%3.20%3.48%3.67%

Financials

0012.HK vs. GMG.AX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Henderson Land and Goodman Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. 0012.HK values in HKD, GMG.AX values in AUD

Frequently Asked Questions


0012.HK and GMG.AX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0012.HK and GMG.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer