GMG.AX vs. CTPNV.AS
GMG.AX (Goodman Group) and CTPNV.AS (CTP N.V) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — GMG.AX in Real Estate - Diversified, CTPNV.AS in Real Estate - Development. Over the past 5 years, GMG.AX returned 10.63%/yr vs 4.05%/yr for CTPNV.AS. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GMG.AX vs. CTPNV.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GMG.AX is traded in AUD, while CTPNV.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CTPNV.AS values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMG.AX achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly higher than CTPNV.AS's -18.02% return.
GMG.AX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 5.71%
- 1Y
- -2.90%
- 3Y*
- 17.92%
- 5Y*
- 10.63%
- 10Y*
- 18.06%
CTPNV.AS
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- YTD
- -18.02%
- 6M
- -17.83%
- 1Y
- -11.88%
- 3Y*
- 11.84%
- 5Y*
- 4.05%
- 10Y*
- —
GMG.AX vs. CTPNV.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMG.AX Goodman Group | 2.45% | -12.27% | 41.44% | 47.71% | -33.40% | 47.07% |
CTPNV.AS CTP N.V | -18.02% | 30.68% | 4.06% | 48.71% | -39.05% | 36.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMG.AX and CTPNV.AS is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMG.AX vs. CTPNV.AS — Risk / Return Rank
GMG.AX
CTPNV.AS
GMG.AX vs. CTPNV.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goodman Group (GMG.AX) and CTP N.V (CTPNV.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GMG.AX | CTPNV.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.93 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | -0.38 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.20 | -0.90 | +0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GMG.AX | CTPNV.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 | -0.51 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.14 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.23 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
GMG.AX vs. CTPNV.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMG.AX drawdown since its inception was -97.46%, which is greater than CTPNV.AS's maximum drawdown of -54.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMG.AX and CTPNV.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMG.AX | CTPNV.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.46% | -54.69% | -42.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.44% | -31.13% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.63% | -31.13% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.15% | -54.69% | +13.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.08% | -25.08% | +8.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.79% | -21.08% | -24.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.68% | 13.20% | +1.48% |
Volatility
GMG.AX vs. CTPNV.AS - Volatility Comparison
Goodman Group (GMG.AX) has a higher volatility of 8.96% compared to CTP N.V (CTPNV.AS) at 5.78%. This indicates that GMG.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTPNV.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMG.AX | CTPNV.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.96% | 5.78% | +3.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.36% | 19.50% | +2.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.07% | 23.07% | +4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.44% | 27.62% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.72% | 27.53% | -0.81% |
Dividends
GMG.AX vs. CTPNV.AS - Dividend Comparison
GMG.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than CTPNV.AS's 4.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTPNV.AS CTP N.V | 4.06% | 3.42% | 3.80% | 3.14% | 3.62% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GMG.AX Goodman Group | 0.95% | 0.97% | 0.42% | 1.19% | 1.73% | 0.74% | 0.80% | 1.17% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 3.48% | 3.67% |
Financials
GMG.AX vs. CTPNV.AS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Goodman Group and CTP N.V. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GMG.AX and CTPNV.AS have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GMG.AX and CTPNV.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer