PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^SPLRCT vs. QDVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^SPLRCT vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 500 Information Technology Index (^SPLRCT) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^SPLRCT vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
^SPLRCT
S&P 500 Information Technology Index
-9.25%23.31%7.40%
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
-4.93%20.16%11.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^SPLRCT achieves a -9.25% return, which is significantly lower than QDVO's -4.93% return.


^SPLRCT

1D
4.24%
1M
-4.73%
YTD
-9.25%
6M
-8.74%
1Y
27.10%
3Y*
25.03%
5Y*
16.73%
10Y*
21.37%

QDVO

1D
0.86%
1M
-2.96%
YTD
-4.93%
6M
-2.40%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^SPLRCT vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^SPLRCT
^SPLRCT Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
^SPLRCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SPLRCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SPLRCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
^SPLRCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SPLRCT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVO
QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^SPLRCT vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 Information Technology Index (^SPLRCT) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^SPLRCTQDVODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

1.14

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.64

1.79

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.26

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

2.13

-0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.72

7.94

-3.22

^SPLRCT vs. QDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^SPLRCT Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the QDVO Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^SPLRCT and QDVO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^SPLRCTQDVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

1.14

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.92

-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between ^SPLRCT and QDVO is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

^SPLRCT vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^SPLRCT drawdown since its inception was -82.51%, which is greater than QDVO's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^SPLRCT and QDVO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^SPLRCTQDVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.51%

-17.75%

-64.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.41%

-10.24%

-8.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.95%

-6.70%

-8.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.50%

-2.51%

-26.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.01%

2.75%

+3.26%

Volatility

^SPLRCT vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison

S&P 500 Information Technology Index (^SPLRCT) has a higher volatility of 7.66% compared to Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) at 5.38%. This indicates that ^SPLRCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^SPLRCTQDVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.66%

5.38%

+2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.92%

9.78%

+6.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.29%

18.61%

+8.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.16%

18.01%

+7.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.74%

18.01%

+6.73%