PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^SOX vs. ^IXIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^SOX vs. ^IXIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PHLX Semiconductor Index (^SOX) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^SOX vs. ^IXIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^SOX
PHLX Semiconductor Index
10.15%42.23%19.27%64.90%-35.83%41.16%51.14%60.12%-7.81%38.23%
^IXIC
NASDAQ Composite
-6.03%20.36%28.64%43.42%-33.10%21.39%43.64%35.23%-3.88%28.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^SOX achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly higher than ^IXIC's -6.03% return. Over the past 10 years, ^SOX has outperformed ^IXIC with an annualized return of 27.61%, while ^IXIC has yielded a comparatively lower 16.09% annualized return.


^SOX

1D
2.82%
1M
-4.12%
YTD
10.15%
6M
20.03%
1Y
82.19%
3Y*
34.16%
5Y*
19.22%
10Y*
27.61%

^IXIC

1D
1.16%
1M
-3.99%
YTD
-6.03%
6M
-4.02%
1Y
25.16%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
16.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^SOX vs. ^IXIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^SOX
^SOX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
^SOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
^SOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

^IXIC
^IXIC Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
^IXIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^IXIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
^IXIC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
^IXIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
^IXIC Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^SOX vs. ^IXIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PHLX Semiconductor Index (^SOX) and NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^SOX^IXICDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.05

1.08

+0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.65

1.68

+0.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.24

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.72

1.98

+2.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.25

7.07

+10.18

^SOX vs. ^IXIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^SOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the ^IXIC Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^SOX and ^IXIC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^SOX^IXICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.08

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.45

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.73

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.51

-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between ^SOX and ^IXIC is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

^SOX vs. ^IXIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^SOX drawdown since its inception was -87.15%, which is greater than ^IXIC's maximum drawdown of -77.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^SOX and ^IXIC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^SOX^IXICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.15%

-77.93%

-9.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.54%

-13.26%

-4.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.47%

-36.40%

-10.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.47%

-36.40%

-10.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.86%

-8.84%

+0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.68%

-21.46%

-18.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.79%

3.71%

+1.08%

Volatility

^SOX vs. ^IXIC - Volatility Comparison

PHLX Semiconductor Index (^SOX) has a higher volatility of 12.76% compared to NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) at 7.06%. This indicates that ^SOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^IXIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^SOX^IXICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.76%

7.06%

+5.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.48%

13.09%

+13.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.29%

23.33%

+16.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.89%

22.44%

+13.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.48%

21.97%

+11.51%