PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^IMUS vs. SPUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^IMUS vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dow Jones Islamic Market U.S. Index (^IMUS) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^IMUS achieves a 13.76% return, which is significantly lower than SPUS's 15.82% return.


^IMUS

1D
-0.68%
1M
6.77%
YTD
13.76%
6M
13.23%
1Y
34.37%
3Y*
22.63%
5Y*
13.78%
10Y*
15.60%

SPUS

1D
-0.86%
1M
9.49%
YTD
15.82%
6M
15.21%
1Y
40.24%
3Y*
24.89%
5Y*
17.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^IMUS vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
^IMUS
Dow Jones Islamic Market U.S. Index
13.76%16.79%24.16%32.07%-25.45%27.79%28.19%1.38%
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
15.82%19.77%26.49%34.24%-22.76%35.92%25.68%0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ^IMUS and SPUS is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2019

0.97

The correlation between ^IMUS and SPUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^IMUS vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^IMUS
^IMUS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
^IMUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^IMUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
^IMUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
^IMUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
^IMUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUS
SPUS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^IMUS vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dow Jones Islamic Market U.S. Index (^IMUS) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^IMUSSPUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.49

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

3.79

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.59

16.32

-5.73

^IMUS vs. SPUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^IMUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the SPUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^IMUS and SPUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^IMUSSPUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

2.86

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.91

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.91

-0.47

Drawdowns

^IMUS vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^IMUS drawdown since its inception was -47.72%, which is greater than SPUS's maximum drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^IMUS and SPUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^IMUSSPUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.72%

-30.80%

-16.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.00%

-10.66%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.09%

-22.82%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.97%

-28.06%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.86%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.59%

-6.21%

-3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

2.47%

+0.38%

Volatility

^IMUS vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dow Jones Islamic Market U.S. Index (^IMUS) is 2.88%, while SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that ^IMUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^IMUSSPUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

4.00%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

10.84%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

14.16%

-1.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.88%

19.23%

-0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.33%

21.28%

-1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, ^IMUS and SPUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPUS has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to ^IMUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^IMUS dropped -47.72% vs SPUS's -30.80%.

SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^IMUS and SPUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer