PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^IMUS vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^IMUS vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dow Jones Islamic Market U.S. Index (^IMUS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^IMUS achieves a 8.63% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ^IMUS having a 15.43% annualized return and VOO not far ahead at 15.61%.


^IMUS

1D
-2.05%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
8.63%
6M
7.58%
1Y
26.94%
3Y*
20.01%
5Y*
12.02%
10Y*
15.43%

VOO

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.19%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.69%
3Y*
20.78%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^IMUS vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^IMUS
Dow Jones Islamic Market U.S. Index
8.63%16.79%24.16%32.07%-25.45%27.79%28.19%31.43%-4.10%22.63%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.19%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ^IMUS and VOO is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.95

The correlation between ^IMUS and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^IMUS vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^IMUS
^IMUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
^IMUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^IMUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
^IMUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
^IMUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
^IMUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^IMUS vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dow Jones Islamic Market U.S. Index (^IMUS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^IMUSVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.67

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.01

11.96

-1.95

^IMUS vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^IMUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^IMUS and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^IMUS vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^IMUS drawdown since its inception was -47.72%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^IMUS and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^IMUSVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.72%

-33.99%

-13.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.00%

-8.90%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.09%

-18.69%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.97%

-24.52%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.20%

-33.99%

+1.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.16%

-3.14%

-2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.64%

-3.68%

-5.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

1.99%

+0.71%

Volatility

^IMUS vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Dow Jones Islamic Market U.S. Index (^IMUS) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.83%. This indicates that ^IMUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^IMUSVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.27%

4.83%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.88%

9.82%

+2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.93%

12.46%

+2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.48%

16.91%

+2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.62%

18.02%

+1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, ^IMUS and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

^IMUS has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to VOO (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^IMUS dropped -47.72% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^IMUS and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer