PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^GSPC vs. UNH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^GSPC vs. UNH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^GSPC achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly lower than UNH's 24.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ^GSPC having a 13.61% annualized return and UNH not far behind at 13.32%.


^GSPC

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
8.56%
6M
8.85%
1Y
22.93%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
13.61%

UNH

1D
0.73%
1M
1.83%
YTD
24.71%
6M
20.44%
1Y
31.88%
3Y*
-4.10%
5Y*
2.27%
10Y*
13.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^GSPC vs. UNH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
8.56%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
24.71%-33.14%-2.41%0.80%6.94%45.20%21.25%20.00%14.52%39.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ^GSPC and UNH is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.40

The correlation between ^GSPC and UNH shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (3 years) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^GSPC vs. UNH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

UNH
UNH Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
UNH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNH Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
UNH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNH Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^GSPC vs. UNH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^GSPCUNHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.19

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

1.11

+1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.37

2.43

+8.95

^GSPC vs. UNH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the UNH Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^GSPC and UNH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^GSPC vs. UNH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^GSPC drawdown since its inception was -56.78%, smaller than the maximum UNH drawdown of -74.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^GSPC and UNH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^GSPCUNHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.78%

-74.37%

+17.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-28.96%

+19.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

-61.39%

+42.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.43%

-61.39%

+35.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

-61.39%

+27.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.34%

-32.27%

+29.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.72%

-14.77%

+4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

13.19%

-11.17%

Volatility

^GSPC vs. UNH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) is 4.43%, while UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that ^GSPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UNH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^GSPCUNHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

7.60%

-3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

30.86%

-21.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

40.10%

-27.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

31.87%

-14.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

30.18%

-12.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


^GSPC and UNH have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UNH has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to ^GSPC (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^GSPC dropped -56.78% vs UNH's -74.37%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^GSPC and UNH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer