^GSPC vs. LLY
^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index, while LLY (Eli Lilly and Company) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, ^GSPC returned 13.61%/yr vs 33.45%/yr for LLY. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
^GSPC vs. LLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ^GSPC achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly higher than LLY's 5.78% return. Over the past 10 years, ^GSPC has underperformed LLY with an annualized return of 13.61%, while LLY has yielded a comparatively higher 33.45% annualized return.
^GSPC
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 8.85%
- 1Y
- 22.93%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.61%
LLY
- 1D
- -2.41%
- 1M
- 11.74%
- YTD
- 5.78%
- 6M
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 40.51%
- 3Y*
- 37.45%
- 5Y*
- 39.59%
- 10Y*
- 33.45%
^GSPC vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 8.56% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 24.23% | -19.44% | 26.89% | 16.26% | 28.88% | -6.24% | 19.42% |
LLY Eli Lilly and Company | 5.78% | 40.25% | 33.30% | 60.91% | 34.26% | 66.08% | 31.04% | 16.14% | 40.45% | 17.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between ^GSPC and LLY is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 1978 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ^GSPC and LLY has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
^GSPC vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank
^GSPC
LLY
^GSPC vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ^GSPC | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.22 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 1.72 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.37 | 4.28 | +7.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
^GSPC vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ^GSPC drawdown since its inception was -56.78%, smaller than the maximum LLY drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^GSPC and LLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ^GSPC | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.78% | -68.24% | +11.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.10% | -23.64% | +14.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.90% | -34.48% | +15.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.43% | -34.48% | +9.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.92% | -34.48% | +0.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -2.41% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.72% | -19.21% | +8.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 9.49% | -7.47% |
Volatility
^GSPC vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) is 4.43%, while Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) has a volatility of 9.27%. This indicates that ^GSPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ^GSPC | LLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 9.27% | -4.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.70% | 27.16% | -17.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.38% | 38.01% | -25.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 32.46% | -15.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.09% | 30.19% | -12.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
^GSPC and LLY have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LLY has higher volatility (9.27%) compared to ^GSPC (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^GSPC dropped -56.78% vs LLY's -68.24%.
^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ^GSPC and LLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer