^GSPC vs. EPP
^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index, while EPP (iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF) is Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pacific ex-Japan Index. Over the past 10 years, ^GSPC returned 13.61%/yr vs 7.79%/yr for EPP. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
^GSPC vs. EPP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ^GSPC having a 8.56% return and EPP slightly higher at 8.62%. Over the past 10 years, ^GSPC has outperformed EPP with an annualized return of 13.61%, while EPP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.79% annualized return.
^GSPC
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 8.85%
- 1Y
- 24.33%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.61%
EPP
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- 8.62%
- 6M
- 9.61%
- 1Y
- 15.65%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 4.53%
- 10Y*
- 7.79%
^GSPC vs. EPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 8.56% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 24.23% | -19.44% | 26.89% | 16.26% | 28.88% | -6.24% | 19.42% |
EPP iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF | 8.62% | 19.70% | 4.76% | 5.76% | -6.59% | 4.26% | 6.04% | 18.30% | -10.78% | 26.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between ^GSPC and EPP is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2001 | 0.72 |
The correlation between ^GSPC and EPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
^GSPC vs. EPP — Risk / Return Rank
^GSPC
EPP
^GSPC vs. EPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) and iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF (EPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ^GSPC | EPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.18 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 1.65 | +0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.37 | 4.95 | +6.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
^GSPC vs. EPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ^GSPC drawdown since its inception was -56.78%, smaller than the maximum EPP drawdown of -66.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^GSPC and EPP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ^GSPC | EPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.78% | -66.01% | +9.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.10% | -8.79% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.90% | -19.29% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.43% | -25.31% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.92% | -39.30% | +5.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -3.64% | +1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.72% | -10.61% | -0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 2.93% | -0.91% |
Volatility
^GSPC vs. EPP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) is 4.43%, while iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF (EPP) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that ^GSPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ^GSPC | EPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 5.46% | -1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.70% | 12.74% | -3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.38% | 15.18% | -2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 17.51% | -0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.09% | 19.14% | -1.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
^GSPC and EPP have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPP has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to ^GSPC (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^GSPC dropped -56.78% vs EPP's -66.01%.
^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ^GSPC and EPP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer