^GSPC vs. 1810.HK

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index, while 1810.HK (Xiaomi Corp) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, ^GSPC returned 11.84%/yr vs -1.61%/yr for 1810.HK. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

^GSPC vs. 1810.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) and Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

^GSPC is traded in USD, while 1810.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 1810.HK values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^GSPC achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly higher than 1810.HK's -33.78% return.

^GSPC

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -0.17%
• YTD: 8.56%
• 6M: 8.85%
• 1Y: 22.93%
• 3Y*: 19.37%
• 5Y*: 11.84%
• 10Y*: 13.61%

1810.HK

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: -17.66%
• YTD: -33.78%
• 6M: -39.41%
• 1Y: -49.72%
• 3Y*: 33.78%
• 5Y*: -1.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^GSPC vs. 1810.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
^GSPC S&P 500 Index	8.56%	16.39%	23.31%	24.23%	-19.44%	26.89%	16.26%	28.88%	-9.17%
1810.HK Xiaomi Corp	-33.78%	13.72%	122.28%	42.62%	-42.22%	-43.13%	208.09%	-16.13%	-22.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ^GSPC and 1810.HK is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2018	0.11

Return for Risk

^GSPC vs. 1810.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^GSPC

^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 73
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 77
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 82

1810.HK

1810.HK Risk / Return Rank: 4
1810.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
1810.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
1810.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 3
1810.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
1810.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^GSPC vs. 1810.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) and Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	^GSPC	1810.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	-1.43	+3.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	-2.36	+4.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	0.74	+0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	-0.89	+3.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.37	-1.51	+12.89

^GSPC vs. 1810.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the 1810.HK Sharpe Ratio of -1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^GSPC and 1810.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

^GSPC vs. 1810.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^GSPC drawdown since its inception was -56.78%, smaller than the maximum 1810.HK drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^GSPC and 1810.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	^GSPC	1810.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.78%	-76.36%	+19.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.10%	-56.97%	+47.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.90%	-56.97%	+38.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.43%	-70.98%	+45.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.34%	-56.36%	+54.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.72%	-42.10%	+31.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	32.95%	-30.93%

Volatility

^GSPC vs. 1810.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) is 4.43%, while Xiaomi Corp (1810.HK) has a volatility of 8.98%. This indicates that ^GSPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 1810.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	^GSPC	1810.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.43%	8.98%	-4.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.70%	26.23%	-16.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.38%	35.45%	-23.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.97%	44.22%	-27.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.09%	45.80%	-27.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ^GSPC and 1810.HK in my portfolio?

^GSPC and 1810.HK have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.