PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^GDAXI vs. BOND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^GDAXI vs. BOND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in DAX Performance Index (^GDAXI) and PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

^GDAXI is traded in EUR, while BOND is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BOND values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^GDAXI achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than BOND's 1.68% return. Over the past 10 years, ^GDAXI has outperformed BOND with an annualized return of 9.39%, while BOND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.94% annualized return.


^GDAXI

1D
-1.31%
1M
3.35%
YTD
1.25%
6M
4.65%
1Y
2.92%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*
9.39%

BOND

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.02%
YTD
1.68%
6M
1.01%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
2.21%
5Y*
1.45%
10Y*
1.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^GDAXI vs. BOND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^GDAXI
DAX Performance Index
1.25%23.01%18.85%20.31%-12.35%15.79%3.55%25.48%-18.26%12.51%
BOND
PIMCO Active Bond ETF
1.68%-4.48%9.55%3.29%-9.27%6.65%-1.09%10.99%4.78%-8.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ^GDAXI and BOND is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2012

-0.01

The correlation between ^GDAXI and BOND shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (5 years) to 0.10 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^GDAXI vs. BOND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^GDAXI
^GDAXI Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
^GDAXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GDAXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GDAXI Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
^GDAXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GDAXI Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

BOND
BOND Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BOND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOND Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOND Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BOND Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOND Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^GDAXI vs. BOND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DAX Performance Index (^GDAXI) and PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^GDAXIBONDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.18

0.78

-0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.38

1.16

-0.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.15

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

1.25

-1.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.74

3.46

-2.71

^GDAXI vs. BOND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^GDAXI Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the BOND Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^GDAXI and BOND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^GDAXIBONDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

0.78

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.19

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.25

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.48

-0.06

Drawdowns

^GDAXI vs. BOND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^GDAXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, which is greater than BOND's maximum drawdown of -15.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^GDAXI and BOND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^GDAXIBONDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.68%

-15.13%

-57.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.27%

-3.67%

-8.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.01%

-11.89%

-4.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.40%

-12.33%

-14.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.78%

-15.13%

-23.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-5.66%

+3.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.71%

-5.28%

-9.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

1.33%

+2.59%

Volatility

^GDAXI vs. BOND - Volatility Comparison

DAX Performance Index (^GDAXI) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) at 1.06%. This indicates that ^GDAXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^GDAXIBONDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

1.06%

+4.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.91%

4.32%

+8.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.99%

5.89%

+10.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

7.87%

+9.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.35%

7.82%

+10.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


^GDAXI and BOND have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^GDAXI has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to BOND (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^GDAXI dropped -72.68% vs BOND's -15.13%.

BOND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^GDAXI and BOND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer