^FCHI vs. IQQQ.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CAC 40 (^FCHI) and iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IQQQ.DE).

IQQQ.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Water. It was launched on Mar 16, 2007.

Performance

^FCHI vs. IQQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CAC 40 (^FCHI) and iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IQQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

^FCHI vs. IQQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
^FCHI CAC 40	-2.30%	10.42%	-2.15%	16.52%	-9.50%	28.85%	-7.14%	26.37%	-10.95%	9.26%
IQQQ.DE iShares Global Water UCITS ETF	2.67%	5.27%	10.22%	9.85%	-16.58%	42.81%	4.77%	38.59%	-6.82%	11.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^FCHI achieves a -2.30% return, which is significantly lower than IQQQ.DE's 2.67% return. Over the past 10 years, ^FCHI has underperformed IQQQ.DE with an annualized return of 6.24%, while IQQQ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.21% annualized return.

^FCHI

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -1.75%
• YTD: -2.30%
• 6M: -1.17%
• 1Y: 1.32%
• 3Y*: 2.72%
• 5Y*: 5.46%
• 10Y*: 6.24%

IQQQ.DE

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -2.77%
• YTD: 2.67%
• 6M: 2.69%
• 1Y: 8.57%
• 3Y*: 8.20%
• 5Y*: 7.13%
• 10Y*: 10.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

^FCHI vs. IQQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^FCHI

^FCHI Risk / Return Rank: 30
^FCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
^FCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
^FCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 17
^FCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
^FCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 50

IQQQ.DE

IQQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
IQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
IQQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
IQQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 27
IQQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
IQQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^FCHI vs. IQQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CAC 40 (^FCHI) and iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IQQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	^FCHI	IQQQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.08	0.61	-0.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.21	0.89	-0.68
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.12	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	1.36	-0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.63	4.19	+0.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

^FCHI vs. IQQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^FCHI Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the IQQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^FCHI and IQQQ.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	^FCHI	IQQQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08	0.61	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	0.49	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.67	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.51	-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between ^FCHI and IQQQ.DE is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Drawdowns

^FCHI vs. IQQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^FCHI drawdown since its inception was -65.29%, which is greater than IQQQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -48.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^FCHI and IQQQ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	^FCHI	IQQQ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.29%	-48.04%	-17.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.08%	-8.97%	-2.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.04%	-24.39%	+1.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.56%	-34.50%	-4.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.64%	-4.84%	-2.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.58%	-7.78%	-15.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	2.60%	+0.63%

Volatility

^FCHI vs. IQQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

CAC 40 (^FCHI) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to iShares Global Water UCITS ETF (IQQQ.DE) at 4.41%. This indicates that ^FCHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	^FCHI	IQQQ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.18%	4.41%	+0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.46%	8.13%	+1.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.86%	14.01%	+1.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.17%	14.42%	+1.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.66%	15.16%	+2.50%