PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^BCOM vs. BHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^BCOM vs. BHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bloomberg Commodity Index (^BCOM) and BHP Group (BHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^BCOM vs. BHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^BCOM
Bloomberg Commodity Index
22.67%11.07%0.12%-12.55%13.75%27.05%-3.50%5.44%-12.99%0.75%
BHP
BHP Group
24.25%28.91%-24.64%16.50%44.34%0.91%25.37%24.50%10.55%33.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^BCOM achieves a 22.67% return, which is significantly lower than BHP's 24.25% return. Over the past 10 years, ^BCOM has underperformed BHP with an annualized return of 5.61%, while BHP has yielded a comparatively higher 20.88% annualized return.


^BCOM

1D
-0.51%
1M
8.68%
YTD
22.67%
6M
27.73%
1Y
26.33%
3Y*
8.44%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
5.61%

BHP

1D
1.13%
1M
-9.64%
YTD
24.25%
6M
34.54%
1Y
57.16%
3Y*
10.16%
5Y*
13.41%
10Y*
20.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Bloomberg Commodity Index

BHP Group

Return for Risk

^BCOM vs. BHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^BCOM
^BCOM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
^BCOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^BCOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
^BCOM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
^BCOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
^BCOM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

BHP
BHP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BHP Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
BHP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^BCOM vs. BHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloomberg Commodity Index (^BCOM) and BHP Group (BHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^BCOMBHPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.53

1.77

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

2.34

-0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.30

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.02

2.93

+2.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.55

10.75

+1.80

^BCOM vs. BHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^BCOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the BHP Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^BCOM and BHP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^BCOMBHPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

1.77

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.42

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.64

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.32

-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between ^BCOM and BHP is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Drawdowns

^BCOM vs. BHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^BCOM drawdown since its inception was -75.00%, roughly equal to the maximum BHP drawdown of -76.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^BCOM and BHP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^BCOMBHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.00%

-76.22%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-19.80%

+10.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.68%

-37.21%

+5.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.05%

-44.29%

+9.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.45%

-9.64%

-33.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.17%

-21.37%

-11.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

5.39%

-2.34%

Volatility

^BCOM vs. BHP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bloomberg Commodity Index (^BCOM) is 7.75%, while BHP Group (BHP) has a volatility of 11.75%. This indicates that ^BCOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^BCOMBHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.75%

11.75%

-4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.71%

22.72%

-9.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.81%

32.44%

-15.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.20%

31.93%

-15.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.60%

32.59%

-17.99%