PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^BCOM vs. DBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^BCOM vs. DBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bloomberg Commodity Index (^BCOM) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^BCOM achieves a 25.04% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 35.47% return. Over the past 10 years, ^BCOM has underperformed DBC with an annualized return of 4.64%, while DBC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.10% annualized return.


^BCOM

1D
-0.05%
1M
-3.59%
YTD
25.04%
6M
23.88%
1Y
34.11%
3Y*
11.17%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
4.64%

DBC

1D
0.56%
1M
-3.32%
YTD
35.47%
6M
35.36%
1Y
45.90%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
12.78%
10Y*
9.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^BCOM vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^BCOM
Bloomberg Commodity Index
25.04%11.07%0.12%-12.55%13.75%27.05%-3.50%5.44%-12.99%0.75%
DBC
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
35.47%8.10%2.18%-6.19%19.34%41.36%-7.84%11.84%-11.63%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between ^BCOM and DBC is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2006

0.85

The correlation between ^BCOM and DBC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^BCOM vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^BCOM
^BCOM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
^BCOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^BCOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
^BCOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
^BCOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
^BCOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

DBC
DBC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBC Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^BCOM vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloomberg Commodity Index (^BCOM) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^BCOMDBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.43

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.38

6.54

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.36

13.91

-3.55

^BCOM vs. DBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^BCOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the DBC Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^BCOM and DBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^BCOMDBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

2.47

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.67

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.51

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.12

-0.06

Drawdowns

^BCOM vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^BCOM drawdown since its inception was -75.00%, roughly equal to the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^BCOM and DBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^BCOMDBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.00%

-76.36%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-7.05%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.78%

-13.82%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.68%

-27.34%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.05%

-41.71%

+6.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.36%

-21.64%

-20.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.21%

-46.22%

+13.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

3.31%

-0.06%

Volatility

^BCOM vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bloomberg Commodity Index (^BCOM) is 5.42%, while Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that ^BCOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^BCOMDBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.42%

6.45%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.23%

15.75%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.10%

18.68%

-1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.44%

19.18%

-2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.70%

17.81%

-3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


^BCOM and DBC have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBC has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to ^BCOM (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^BCOM dropped -75.00% vs DBC's -76.36%.

DBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^BCOM and DBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer