PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCA vs. USCL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USCA vs. USCL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF (USCL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with USCA having a 7.54% return and USCL slightly higher at 7.58%.


USCA

1D
0.46%
1M
4.36%
YTD
7.54%
6M
7.35%
1Y
21.47%
3Y*
20.91%
5Y*
10Y*

USCL

1D
0.51%
1M
4.36%
YTD
7.58%
6M
7.33%
1Y
21.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCA vs. USCL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
USCA
Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF
7.54%14.24%27.24%12.74%
USCL
Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF
7.58%14.26%27.04%12.71%

Correlation

The correlation between USCA and USCL is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2023

0.99

The correlation between USCA and USCL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

USCA vs. USCL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USCA
USCL

Technology

29.4%
29.4%

Financial Services

13.6%
13.6%

Communication Services

12.7%
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
11.9%

Healthcare

10.7%
10.7%

Industrials

7.0%
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.7%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.4%
2.4%

Real Estate

2.3%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.9%

Technology

USCA
29.4%
USCL
29.4%

Financial Services

USCA
13.6%
USCL
13.6%

Communication Services

USCA
12.7%
USCL
12.7%

Consumer Cyclical

USCA
11.9%
USCL
11.9%

Healthcare

USCA
10.7%
USCL
10.7%

Industrials

USCA
7.0%
USCL
7.0%

Consumer Defensive

USCA
4.7%
USCL
4.7%

Energy

USCA
3.5%
USCL
3.5%

Utilities

USCA
2.4%
USCL
2.4%

Real Estate

USCA
2.3%
USCL
2.3%

Basic Materials

USCA
1.9%
USCL
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USCA vs. USCL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCA
USCA Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
USCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
USCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCA Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

USCL
USCL Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
USCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCL Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
USCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCL Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCA vs. USCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF (USCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USCAUSCLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.11

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.33

8.34

-0.01

USCA vs. USCL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCA Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the USCL Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCA and USCL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USCAUSCLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.78

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.50

1.41

+0.08

Drawdowns

USCA vs. USCL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCA drawdown since its inception was -19.14%, roughly equal to the maximum USCL drawdown of -19.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCA and USCL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USCAUSCLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.14%

-19.00%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.25%

-10.24%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.35%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.16%

-2.27%

+0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.58%

0.00%

Volatility

USCA vs. USCL - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF (USCA) and Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF (USCL) have volatilities of 2.85% and 2.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USCAUSCLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

2.80%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

9.06%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

12.13%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

14.83%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.75%

14.83%

-0.08%

USCA vs. USCL - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than USCL's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

USCA vs. USCL - Dividend Comparison

USCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, which matches USCL's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
USCA
Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF
1.08%1.14%1.22%1.15%
USCL
Ishares Climate Conscious & Transition MSCI USA ETF
1.07%1.10%1.18%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, USCA and USCL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

USCA has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to USCL (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCA dropped -19.14% vs USCL's -19.00%.

On 1-year performance, USCL leads with 21.48% vs 21.47% for USCA. On fees, USCA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USCL has performed better with a 21.48% return vs 21.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USCA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for USCL.

USCA has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 1.07% for USCL.

USCA tracks MSCI USA Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while USCL tracks MSCI USA Extended Climate Action Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for USCA and 0.08% for USCL.

USCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USCA and USCL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer