PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLDTX vs. STIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLDTX vs. STIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price U.S. Limited Duration TIPS Index Fund (TLDTX) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLDTX achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than STIP's 2.04% return.


TLDTX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
1.81%
6M
1.84%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
3.87%
5Y*
1.92%
10Y*

STIP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.03%
YTD
2.04%
6M
2.03%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*
3.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLDTX vs. STIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TLDTX
T. Rowe Price U.S. Limited Duration TIPS Index Fund
1.81%6.32%1.16%3.23%-4.84%5.08%1.50%
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
2.04%6.03%4.77%4.63%-3.02%5.68%1.23%

Correlation

The correlation between TLDTX and STIP is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2020

0.89

The correlation between TLDTX and STIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLDTX vs. STIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLDTX
TLDTX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TLDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TLDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

STIP
STIP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
STIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
STIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
STIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLDTX vs. STIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price U.S. Limited Duration TIPS Index Fund (TLDTX) and iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLDTXSTIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.69

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

6.76

-5.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.59

26.37

-23.78

TLDTX vs. STIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLDTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the STIP Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLDTX and STIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLDTXSTIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

3.23

-2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

1.23

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

1.07

-0.51

Drawdowns

TLDTX vs. STIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLDTX drawdown since its inception was -7.24%, which is greater than STIP's maximum drawdown of -5.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLDTX and STIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLDTXSTIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.24%

-5.50%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.28%

-0.69%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.50%

-0.95%

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.24%

-5.50%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.18%

-0.03%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-0.99%

-1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

0.18%

+1.50%

Volatility

TLDTX vs. STIP - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price U.S. Limited Duration TIPS Index Fund (TLDTX) has a higher volatility of 0.69% compared to iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) at 0.40%. This indicates that TLDTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLDTXSTIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

0.40%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.38%

0.99%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.75%

1.46%

+3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.66%

2.75%

+1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.48%

2.45%

+2.03%

TLDTX vs. STIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLDTX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than STIP's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TLDTX vs. STIP - Dividend Comparison

TLDTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than STIP's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
4.30%4.11%2.62%2.84%6.04%4.15%1.40%2.06%2.44%1.59%0.89%
TLDTX
T. Rowe Price U.S. Limited Duration TIPS Index Fund
4.47%4.66%1.63%4.09%6.45%4.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLDTX and STIP have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLDTX has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to STIP (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLDTX dropped -7.24% vs STIP's -5.50%.

STIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLDTX and STIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer