TLDTX vs. XLG
TLDTX (T. Rowe Price U.S. Limited Duration TIPS Index Fund) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both funds - TLDTX is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Over the past 5 years, TLDTX returned 1.79%/yr vs 14.28%/yr for XLG. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TLDTX charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.
Performance
TLDTX vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLDTX achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 1.60% return.
TLDTX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 3.21%
- 3Y*
- 3.61%
- 5Y*
- 1.79%
- 10Y*
- —
XLG
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- -5.41%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 0.73%
- 1Y
- 19.95%
- 3Y*
- 21.35%
- 5Y*
- 14.28%
- 10Y*
- 16.94%
TLDTX vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLDTX T. Rowe Price U.S. Limited Duration TIPS Index Fund | 0.93% | 6.32% | 1.16% | 3.23% | -4.84% | 5.08% | 1.50% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 1.60% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 3.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLDTX and XLG is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2020 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLDTX vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
TLDTX
XLG
TLDTX vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price U.S. Limited Duration TIPS Index Fund (TLDTX) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLDTX | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.26 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 1.61 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.94 | 5.77 | -3.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLDTX vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLDTX drawdown since its inception was -7.24%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLDTX and XLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLDTX | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.24% | -52.39% | +45.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.28% | -12.41% | +9.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.50% | -20.70% | +16.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.24% | -28.02% | +20.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.03% | -6.91% | +4.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -7.63% | +5.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 3.46% | -1.74% |
Volatility
TLDTX vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price U.S. Limited Duration TIPS Index Fund (TLDTX) is 0.88%, while Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that TLDTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLDTX | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.88% | 5.04% | -4.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.51% | 10.74% | -9.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.79% | 13.98% | -9.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.66% | 18.79% | -14.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.47% | 18.88% | -14.41% |
TLDTX vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLDTX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TLDTX vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
TLDTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than XLG's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLDTX T. Rowe Price U.S. Limited Duration TIPS Index Fund | 4.51% | 4.66% | 1.63% | 4.09% | 6.45% | 4.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.66% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLDTX and XLG have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLG has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to TLDTX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLDTX dropped -7.24% vs XLG's -52.39%.
XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLDTX and XLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer