PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Value Fund
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


VTV 33.33%SCHD 33.33%VEA 33.33%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Value Fund, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is never rebalanced.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Oct 20, 2011, corresponding to the inception date of SCHD

Returns By Period

As of Apr 2, 2026, the Value Fund returned 6.96% Year-To-Date and 11.47% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
Value Fund
-0.04%-2.75%6.96%9.93%18.02%13.85%9.40%11.47%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
0.16%-3.03%3.71%6.74%16.12%14.94%10.95%11.89%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
0.16%-2.44%12.35%13.88%13.89%11.70%8.35%12.30%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
-0.77%-2.79%3.65%8.84%30.37%16.09%8.76%9.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Oct 21, 2011, Value Fund's average daily return is +0.05%, while the average monthly return is +0.98%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 5.9 years.

Historically, 67% of months were positive and 33% were negative. The best month was Nov 2020 with a return of +13.3%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -13.8%. The longest winning streak lasted 9 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.

On a daily basis, Value Fund closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 24, 2020 with a return of +8.9%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -10.6%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20266.45%5.36%-4.82%0.19%6.96%
20253.35%1.80%-1.45%-3.78%2.78%3.06%-0.24%4.42%0.95%-0.54%2.41%1.18%14.54%
20240.17%2.59%4.65%-4.06%2.95%-0.28%4.98%2.67%1.18%-1.49%4.20%-5.94%11.53%
20233.67%-3.32%-0.09%0.87%-4.03%5.44%3.69%-2.34%-3.77%-3.28%6.96%5.69%8.90%
2022-2.37%-1.79%2.62%-4.92%2.89%-8.17%4.61%-3.32%-8.03%10.45%7.54%-3.14%-5.41%
2021-0.82%4.82%6.69%2.84%3.19%-1.07%0.75%1.91%-3.71%4.52%-2.99%6.53%24.35%

Benchmark Metrics

Value Fund has an annualized alpha of 0.99%, beta of 0.85, and R² of 0.87 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since October 21, 2011.

  • This portfolio participated in 90.33% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 89.28% of its upside — more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.
  • With beta of 0.85 and R² of 0.87, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index — much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Alpha
0.99%
Beta
0.85
0.87
Upside Capture
89.28%
Downside Capture
90.33%

Expense Ratio

Value Fund has an expense ratio of 0.04%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Value Fund ranks 45 for risk / return — on par with similar portfolios. You're getting a typical balance of risk and reward. Not a standout, but not a red flag either — a reasonable choice if other factors align with your goals.


Value Fund Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
Value Fund Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Value Fund Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
Value Fund Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
Value Fund Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
Value Fund Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

0.88

+0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.75

1.37

+0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.21

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

1.39

+0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.04

6.43

+0.61


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
561.091.571.231.486.62
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
400.891.341.191.093.69
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
831.732.361.352.6410.14

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Value Fund Sharpe ratios as of Apr 2, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.22
  • 5-Year: 0.68
  • 10-Year: 0.71
  • All Time: 0.75

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.00 to 1.69, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Value Fund compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Value Fund provided a 2.79% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio2.79%3.03%3.10%3.03%2.94%2.70%2.59%2.84%3.05%2.56%2.79%2.83%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
2.02%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.45%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.90%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Value Fund. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Value Fund was 35.05%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 161 trading sessions.

The current Value Fund drawdown is 4.60%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-35.05%Jan 21, 202044Mar 23, 2020161Nov 9, 2020205
-19.1%Jan 13, 2022180Sep 30, 2022303Dec 14, 2023483
-18.16%Jan 29, 2018229Dec 24, 2018131Jul 3, 2019360
-14.14%May 22, 2015183Feb 11, 201692Jun 23, 2016275
-13.88%Dec 2, 202487Apr 8, 202557Jul 1, 2025144

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 3 assets, with an effective number of assets of 3.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkVEASCHDVTVPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.810.820.880.89
VEA0.811.000.740.780.87
SCHD0.820.741.000.940.96
VTV0.880.780.941.000.97
Portfolio0.890.870.960.971.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Oct 21, 2011