PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


Benchmark: S&P 500 Index · Rebalance: Every 3 months

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Benchmark

Compare your portfolio against anything

Returns By Period


Position1D1M6MYTD1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*ALL TIME*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.70%0.09%7.94%9.41%18.15%17.84%11.25%13.26%8.09%
Portfolio
FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ
3.32%0.77%7.22%3.11%7.65%49.49%34.73%34.94%
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
-1.90%-11.97%101.14%122.33%170.06%59.38%35.00%54.21%9.59%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
15.32%12.36%13.49%17.66%16.01%27.29%10.30%21.72%30.20%
APP
AppLovin Corporation
-1.97%-29.88%-16.32%-41.25%1.33%132.67%45.14%38.74%
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
0.37%5.40%17.93%12.89%33.51%63.70%54.52%40.86%40.74%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.28%-9.17%-22.16%-15.51%-27.79%20.28%9.53%16.39%20.02%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
3.02%20.93%8.48%-3.48%-12.20%12.25%11.19%24.97%25.16%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
-2.00%-3.34%-14.11%-23.52%-38.15%17.81%6.74%22.59%30.45%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
2.93%1.60%5.16%7.77%13.01%62.93%59.52%64.62%36.28%
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
1.81%-8.55%-20.54%-32.73%-48.24%4.50%9.78%13.99%21.48%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.65%-2.12%-16.05%-30.77%-22.29%83.27%41.48%53.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Apr 15, 2021, FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ's average daily return is +0.14%, while the average monthly return is +2.93%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 2.0 years.

Historically, 61% of months were positive and 39% were negative. The best month was May 2023 with a return of +25.0%, while the worst month was Apr 2022 at -20.5%. The longest winning streak lasted 8 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +15.1%, while the worst single day was Feb 3, 2022 at -8.0%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
2026-3.83%-7.55%-3.13%18.39%12.63%-12.66%2.80%3.11%
20253.19%-4.89%-10.43%5.34%18.94%11.72%8.61%-1.36%8.64%5.48%-5.90%-1.84%39.52%
20248.73%18.80%3.94%-5.92%8.71%10.74%-4.08%4.40%9.43%2.30%15.44%5.20%107.04%
202317.54%4.70%14.87%2.08%24.97%7.18%6.69%0.74%-6.36%0.19%12.99%5.56%132.49%
2022-14.24%-6.62%5.12%-20.47%-0.35%-12.46%13.97%-9.10%-12.48%-0.81%10.62%-7.41%-46.20%
2021-0.79%2.03%8.78%-0.09%7.55%-5.07%11.85%5.08%-0.71%31.09%

Benchmark Metrics

FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ has an annualized alpha of 15.29%, beta of 1.66, and R2 of 0.74 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since April 15, 2021.

  • This portfolio captured 240.07% of S&P 500 Index gains and 130.17% of its losses - amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 15.29% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
  • Beta of 1.66 means this portfolio moves significantly more than S&P 500 Index - expect amplified gains in rallies and amplified losses in downturns.

Alpha
15.29%
Beta
1.66
0.74
Upside Capture
240.07%
Downside Capture
130.17%

Expense Ratio

FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ ranks 8 for risk / return — above 8% of Portfolios peers on PortfoliosLab. Its historical combined result is below most peers; review the five component ranks for context.


FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

Risk / Return Metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ and compares them with S&P 500 Index.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.28

1.42

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.57

1.98

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.25

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

2.00

-1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.66

8.49

-7.83


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
94
2.402.981.376.1612.22
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
60
0.460.941.110.741.58
APP
AppLovin Corporation
46
0.020.531.070.030.05
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
67
0.711.271.161.172.34
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
11
-0.73-0.910.89-0.84-1.52
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
28
-0.39-0.390.95-0.35-0.63
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
6
-1.10-1.610.80-0.82-1.45
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
56
0.360.761.090.651.32
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
14
-0.73-1.110.88-0.75-1.18
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
26
-0.43-0.300.96-0.46-0.87

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk. Learn how to interpret the Sharpe ratio.

The current FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ Sharpe ratio is 0.28 as of Aug 1, 2026 (the value is recalculated daily), calculated over the past 12 months.

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.18 to 2.00, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ provided a 0.36% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.36%0.30%0.34%0.43%0.68%0.50%0.66%0.81%0.84%0.65%0.69%0.75%
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
APP
AppLovin Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
0.65%0.70%0.94%1.71%3.02%2.24%3.05%3.54%3.11%1.87%1.43%1.13%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.38%0.32%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.77%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
ORCL
Oracle Corporation
1.54%0.97%0.96%1.44%1.57%1.38%1.48%1.72%1.68%1.52%1.56%1.56%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ was 52.65%, occurring on Nov 3, 2022. Recovery took 153 trading sessions.

The current FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ drawdown is 11.25%.


Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

Related event

-52.65%Nov 2022
11mo 16d7mo 14d
1y 6moNov 2021 - Jun 2023
Bear market2022
-30.32%Apr 2025
1mo 15d2mo
3mo 15dFeb 2025 - Jun 2025
2025 selloff2025
-26.43%Mar 2026
5mo 1d1mo 29d
7moOct 2025 - May 2026
-17.73%Aug 2024
25d1mo 15d
2mo 10dJul 2024 - Sep 2024
-17.24%Jul 2026
1mo 27d
2moJun 2026 - now

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 10 assets, with an effective number of assets of 8.62, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is well-distributed across most of your holdings, with only mild concentration in a few names. True diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.66

1.46

1.40

1.40

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.40, in line with the typical range across portfolios.

FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ correlation to the S&P 500 Index

FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ has a 0.78 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021

0.83


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. MSFT has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.71, while NFLX has the lowest at 0.49.

NFLX
0.49
APP
0.51
PLTR
0.56
ORCL
0.58
AMD
0.63
META
0.64
AVGO
0.69
AMZN
0.69
NVDA
0.69
MSFT
0.71

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ. NVDA has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.83, while NFLX has the lowest at 0.58.

NFLX
0.58
ORCL
0.60
APP
0.67
PLTR
0.69
AMD
0.71
META
0.73
AMZN
0.75
MSFT
0.75
AVGO
0.77
NVDA
0.83

Asset Correlations Table

See how each holding historically moved in relation to the other holdings, the portfolio, and the selected benchmark.

Based on daily historical returns since Apr 15, 2021
Diversification Analysis

Find what FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ is missing

See which holdings overlap, where FAANG + + CORE instead of Leveraged FNGU/BULZ is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification