PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MIO3
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


SCHD 25.00%XLU 25.00%IGRO 25.00%VNQ 25.00%EquityEquityReal EstateReal Estate

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in MIO3, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is May 19, 2016, corresponding to the inception date of IGRO

Returns By Period


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.63%-3.84%-1.98%29.73%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
MIO3
0.44%-1.46%6.88%6.45%23.17%12.29%7.84%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
0.16%-1.41%12.35%13.59%25.56%11.70%8.35%12.30%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
1.36%-3.58%3.06%0.66%11.42%7.33%3.14%4.85%
XLU
Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.50%-0.50%9.31%5.76%27.89%14.75%11.01%9.89%
IGRO
iShares International Dividend Growth ETF
-0.24%-0.67%2.46%5.42%27.02%14.40%7.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since May 20, 2016, MIO3's average daily return is +0.04%, while the average monthly return is +0.83%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 7.0 years.

Historically, 66% of months were positive and 34% were negative. The best month was Nov 2020 with a return of +9.6%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -14.1%. The longest winning streak lasted 8 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.

On a daily basis, MIO3 closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 24, 2020 with a return of +9.5%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -12.7%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20264.09%6.78%-4.61%0.80%6.88%
20252.35%2.34%-0.25%-1.56%2.72%1.19%0.33%2.77%1.04%-0.60%2.44%-1.22%12.03%
2024-1.95%1.77%3.93%-3.45%5.07%-1.13%6.44%4.00%3.32%-2.24%3.25%-6.82%11.91%
20234.44%-4.72%0.92%1.27%-4.51%4.14%2.91%-3.65%-4.97%-2.23%7.67%5.72%6.06%
2022-4.04%-2.15%4.77%-4.43%1.05%-6.81%5.07%-3.44%-9.87%4.78%8.10%-2.49%-10.58%
2021-0.56%0.86%7.11%4.23%1.38%-0.57%2.26%2.39%-4.81%4.90%-2.50%8.04%24.29%

Benchmark Metrics

MIO3 has an annualized alpha of 0.39%, beta of 0.74, and R² of 0.70 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since May 20, 2016.

  • This portfolio participated in 81.79% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 73.67% of its upside — more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.

Alpha
0.39%
Beta
0.74
0.70
Upside Capture
73.67%
Downside Capture
81.79%

Expense Ratio

MIO3 has an expense ratio of 0.14%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

MIO3 ranks 31 for risk / return — below 31% of portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


MIO3 Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
MIO3 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIO3 Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIO3 Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MIO3 Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIO3 Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

0.88

+0.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.52

1.37

+0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.21

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

1.39

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.51

6.43

+0.08


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
400.891.341.191.093.69
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
150.180.361.050.291.11
XLU
Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund
611.271.731.242.245.38
IGRO
iShares International Dividend Growth ETF
661.341.851.271.967.44

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

MIO3 Sharpe ratios as of Apr 4, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.08
  • 5-Year: 0.58
  • All Time: 0.60

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.99 to 1.69, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of MIO3 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

MIO3 provided a 3.09% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio3.09%3.24%3.22%3.41%3.23%2.60%3.16%2.99%3.52%3.15%3.08%2.64%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.45%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.86%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%
XLU
Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund
2.57%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%
IGRO
iShares International Dividend Growth ETF
2.49%2.51%2.44%2.79%2.69%2.27%2.41%2.65%2.97%2.43%1.18%0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the MIO3. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the MIO3 was 36.66%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 188 trading sessions.

The current MIO3 drawdown is 3.85%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-36.66%Feb 19, 202024Mar 23, 2020188Dec 17, 2020212
-21.5%Apr 21, 2022121Oct 12, 2022399May 15, 2024520
-12.55%Dec 2, 202487Apr 8, 202545Jun 12, 2025132
-11.2%Aug 30, 201880Dec 24, 201834Feb 13, 2019114
-8.69%Dec 19, 201735Feb 8, 2018122Aug 3, 2018157

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 4.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkXLUIGROVNQSCHDPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.370.650.580.770.72
XLU0.371.000.320.600.450.75
IGRO0.650.321.000.500.600.72
VNQ0.580.600.501.000.620.86
SCHD0.770.450.600.621.000.81
Portfolio0.720.750.720.860.811.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from May 20, 2016