PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Top 5
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


MSFT 20.00%AAPL 20.00%GOOGL 20.00%META 20.00%NVDA 20.00%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for Top 5

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Top 5, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 6, 2026, the Top 5 returned 2.41% Year-To-Date and 35.63% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.30%0.09%8.18%8.17%23.42%19.88%11.91%13.45%
Portfolio
Top 5
-0.79%-3.07%2.41%1.52%30.97%37.30%28.79%35.63%
AAPL
Apple Inc
-1.89%2.90%11.12%8.71%48.46%19.11%19.46%29.63%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
-1.36%-9.30%16.22%15.96%110.03%44.20%24.94%25.89%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-1.28%-3.98%-11.24%-12.06%-15.84%30.58%12.31%17.60%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-1.18%-0.60%-14.48%-15.77%-11.77%8.85%11.09%24.64%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
1.73%-2.94%12.01%12.58%47.43%75.35%64.54%68.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since May 21, 2012, Top 5's average daily return is +0.13%, while the average monthly return is +2.63%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 2.2 years.

Historically, 67% of months were positive and 33% were negative. The best month was Mar 2023 with a return of +17.2%, while the worst month was Apr 2022 at -15.9%. The longest winning streak lasted 11 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, Top 5 closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +13.6%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -14.5%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20260.69%-6.35%-6.18%14.48%6.33%-4.91%2.41%
20251.55%-3.85%-10.05%-0.15%12.33%9.26%6.91%2.20%6.90%3.78%0.10%-0.09%30.48%
20247.26%12.19%4.53%-3.19%12.19%8.78%-3.58%2.04%3.67%0.59%2.70%3.20%61.63%
202316.79%6.92%17.22%5.25%14.27%6.21%6.46%-0.99%-5.47%-0.84%10.79%3.87%112.57%
2022-7.86%-8.53%5.72%-15.92%-2.24%-10.42%10.67%-6.54%-14.04%-2.22%12.36%-9.16%-41.79%
20210.42%1.80%3.05%10.30%0.83%10.48%4.40%7.71%-7.78%10.63%7.47%0.01%59.61%

Benchmark Metrics

Top 5 has an annualized alpha of 15.74%, beta of 1.29, and R2 of 0.69 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since May 21, 2012.

  • This portfolio captured 179.41% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 92.33% of its losses - a favorable profile for investors.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 15.74% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
15.74%
Beta
1.29
0.69
Upside Capture
179.41%
Downside Capture
92.33%

Expense Ratio

Top 5 has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Top 5 ranks 22 for risk / return — below 22% of Portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


Top 5 Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
Top 5 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Top 5 Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
Top 5 Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
Top 5 Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
Top 5 Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for Top 5 and compares them with S&P 500 Index.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

1.66

1.94

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

2.33

2.63

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.35

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

2.59

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.08

11.84

-5.77


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
AAPL
Apple Inc
882.183.091.393.538.89
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
963.785.101.615.4319.79
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
23-0.45-0.440.94-0.48-1.01
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
24-0.47-0.490.94-0.35-0.73
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
771.371.941.242.365.73

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Top 5 Sharpe ratios as of Jun 6, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.66
  • 5-Year: 1.00
  • 10-Year: 1.26
  • All Time: 1.30

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.64 to 2.53, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Top 5 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Top 5 provided a 0.40% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.40%0.34%0.36%0.25%0.37%0.25%0.33%0.50%0.79%0.72%0.95%1.09%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.35%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
0.29%0.27%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.36%0.32%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.86%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Top 5. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Top 5 was 48.35%, occurring on Nov 3, 2022. Recovery took 140 trading sessions.

The current Top 5 drawdown is 4.54%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

Bear market2022
-48.35%Nov 2022
10mo 10d6mo 24d
1y 4moDec 2021 - May 2023
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-31.19%Dec 2018
3mo 21d8mo 22d
1y 8dSep 2018 - Sep 2019
COVID crash2020
-30.81%Mar 2020
25d2mo 5d
3moFeb 2020 - May 2020
2025 selloff2025
-25.52%Apr 2025
3mo 1d2mo 18d
5mo 19dJan 2025 - Jun 2025
2026 correction2026
-18.30%Mar 2026
5mo 1d28d
5mo 29dOct 2025 - Apr 2026

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 5 assets, with an effective number of assets of 5.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.58

1.35

1.26

1.23

1.29

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.29, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.

Top 5 correlation to the S&P 500 Index

Top 5 has a 0.79 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012

0.78


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. MSFT has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.71, while META has the lowest at 0.56.

META
0.56
NVDA
0.61
AAPL
0.63
GOOGL
0.67
MSFT
0.71

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. Top 5. NVDA has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.79, while AAPL has the lowest at 0.70.

AAPL
0.70
MSFT
0.76
GOOGL
0.76
META
0.76
NVDA
0.79

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

AAPLMETANVDAGOOGLMSFT
AAPL1.000.430.460.520.53
META0.431.000.470.580.50
NVDA0.460.471.000.490.55
GOOGL0.520.580.491.000.61
MSFT0.530.500.550.611.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from May 21, 2012
Diversification Analysis

Find what Top 5 is missing

See which holdings overlap, where Top 5 is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification