Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | Total Bond Market | 35% |
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | Government Bonds, Ultrashort Bond | 20% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | Dividend | 20% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | Inflation-Protected Bonds | 15% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | Global Equities, Dividend | 10% |
Benchmark: S&P 500 Index · Rebalance: Every 3 months
Find the right asset allocation for Income Portfolio
Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio OptimizerPerformance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Income Portfolio, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading charts...
Compare your portfolio against anything
Returns By Period
As of Jul 31, 2026, the Income Portfolio returned 5.85% Year-To-Date and 4.98% of annualized return in the last 10 years.
| Position | 1D | 1M | 6M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* | ALL TIME* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 1.66% | -0.82% | 6.72% | 8.65% | 16.89% | 17.46% | 11.09% | 13.10% | 8.07% |
Portfolio Income Portfolio | -0.27% | 1.24% | 3.77% | 5.85% | 9.44% | 6.88% | 3.56% | 4.98% | 4.86% |
| Portfolio components: | |||||||||
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 0.01% | 0.30% | 1.77% | 2.05% | 3.78% | 4.56% | 3.53% | 2.24% | 1.37% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.06% | -1.02% | -0.53% | -0.28% | 2.92% | 3.79% | -0.37% | 1.38% | 3.00% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | -0.20% | 5.58% | 5.16% | 9.03% | 17.88% | 12.49% | 9.56% | 9.21% | 5.77% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | -1.24% | 5.36% | 15.63% | 23.81% | 29.05% | 13.95% | 9.50% | 12.66% | 13.38% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | -0.08% | -0.60% | 0.09% | 0.65% | 2.50% | 3.69% | 0.32% | 2.41% | 2.73% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Oct 20, 2011, Income Portfolio's average daily return is +0.02%, while the average monthly return is +0.41%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 14.1 years.
Historically, 67% of months were positive and 33% were negative. The best month was Nov 2020 with a return of +4.9%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -5.1%. The longest winning streak lasted 14 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.
On a daily basis, Income Portfolio closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 13, 2020 with a return of +3.8%, while the worst single day was Mar 12, 2020 at -5.0%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.29% | 2.59% | -1.85% | 1.46% | 0.58% | -0.54% | 1.24% | 5.85% | |||||
| 2025 | 1.20% | 1.68% | 0.05% | -0.98% | 0.33% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 2.22% | 0.27% | -0.05% | 1.20% | 0.06% | 7.56% |
| 2024 | -0.03% | -0.20% | 1.73% | -2.31% | 1.74% | 0.31% | 3.07% | 1.50% | 1.15% | -1.36% | 1.58% | -2.59% | 4.52% |
| 2023 | 2.73% | -2.11% | 1.62% | 0.34% | -1.78% | 1.46% | 1.08% | -0.97% | -2.38% | -1.70% | 4.25% | 3.54% | 5.96% |
| 2022 | -1.45% | -0.64% | -0.07% | -3.18% | 1.24% | -3.50% | 2.74% | -2.34% | -4.93% | 2.68% | 3.77% | -1.46% | -7.30% |
| 2021 | -0.35% | 0.73% | 1.97% | 1.30% | 1.41% | 0.01% | 1.01% | 0.46% | -1.41% | 1.50% | -0.71% | 2.08% | 8.24% |
Benchmark Metrics
Income Portfolio has an annualized alpha of 1.59%, beta of 0.24, and R2 of 0.61 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since October 20, 2011.
- This portfolio participated in 33.73% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 29.64% of its upside - more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.
- Beta of 0.24 indicates this portfolio moves significantly less than S&P 500 Index - a genuinely defensive profile with reduced participation in both market rallies and downturns.
- Alpha
- 1.59%
- Beta
- 0.24
- R²
- 0.61
- Upside Capture
- 29.64%
- Downside Capture
- 33.73%
Expense Ratio
Income Portfolio has an expense ratio of 0.11%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
Income Portfolio ranks 91 for risk / return — above 91% of Portfolios peers on PortfoliosLab. Its historical combined result is among the stronger results in the peer group.
Risk / Return Metrics
The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for Income Portfolio and compares them with S&P 500 Index.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.47 | 1.32 | +1.15 |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.89 | 1.86 | +2.03 |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.24 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 1.86 | +1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.13 | 7.90 | +5.22 |
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Position | Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 100 | 19.09 | 152.25 | 68.95 | 347.20 | 2,462.16 |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 32 | 0.79 | 1.17 | 1.14 | 1.10 | 2.77 |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 77 | 1.85 | 2.72 | 1.34 | 2.40 | 7.62 |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 95 | 2.62 | 4.06 | 1.47 | 6.32 | 15.99 |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 34 | 0.77 | 1.13 | 1.13 | 1.30 | 3.55 |
Loading charts...
Dividends
Dividend yield
Income Portfolio provided a 3.81% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 3.81% | 3.88% | 3.85% | 3.55% | 3.27% | 2.29% | 2.01% | 2.66% | 2.66% | 2.18% | 2.07% | 1.98% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||||||
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.81% | 4.13% | 5.03% | 4.92% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.30% | 2.05% | 1.66% | 0.68% | 0.07% | 0.00% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 4.01% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 3.42% | 3.28% | 3.88% | 3.31% | 3.30% | 3.30% | 3.16% | 3.99% | 3.87% | 3.46% | 3.90% | 4.48% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.14% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 4.50% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading charts...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Income Portfolio. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the Income Portfolio was 12.24%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 56 trading sessions.
The current Income Portfolio drawdown is 0.37%.
Drawdown | Fall | Recovery | Underwater | Related event |
|---|---|---|---|---|
-12.24%Mar 2020 | 26d | 2mo 22d | 3mo 18dFeb 2020 - Jun 2020 | COVID crash2020 |
-11.85%Oct 2022 | 9mo 20d | 1y 8mo | 2y 6moJan 2022 - Jul 2024 | Bear market2022 |
-6.52%Jan 2016 | 8mo 28d | 3mo | 11mo 28dApr 2015 - Apr 2016 | — |
-4.93%Dec 2018 | 10mo 29d | 1mo 23d | 1y 17dJan 2018 - Feb 2019 | Rate-hike selloffLate 2018 |
-4.25%Jun 2013 | 1mo 3d | 4mo 3d | 5mo 6dMay 2013 - Oct 2013 | — |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Diversification
AI Analysis
The gist
The portfolio is really two portfolios in one: a bond sleeve centered on Vanguard Total Bond Market (BND), Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP), and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL), plus an equity sleeve centered on Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and WisdomTree International Dividend Fund (PID). The bet is on income with some rate sensitivity, not on broad diversification in the dramatic sense.
The numbers
- Diversification ratio is 1.32 at 1Y and 3Y, 1.35 at 10Y, placing it around the 51st-68th percentile on the platform: decent, but not a magic trick.
- Effective asset count is 4.26 of 5, so the weights are fairly spread; the issue is correlation, not concentration.
- Correlation is low on average (0.15), but two pairs do the real work of the portfolio: BND and SCHP at 0.79, SCHD and PID at 0.76.
The good
- BIL is almost orthogonal to everything else, which is rare and pleasant. It is the portfolio’s cleanest diversifier.
- The bond sleeve and equity sleeve are structurally distinct enough to keep the whole thing from behaving like one trade, to be fair.
- Negative or near-zero cross-pair correlations, such as BND with SCHD at -0.06, help prevent total lockstep behavior.
The bad
- BND and SCHP are a classic duration-plus-inflation pair, so their 0.79 correlation means part of the bond sleeve is doing the same job twice.
- SCHD and PID are both dividend equities, and their 0.76 correlation makes the equity sleeve more “income factor” than broad equity diversification.
- Position-to-portfolio correlations show SCHD at 0.82 and PID at 0.80, so the portfolio’s equity behavior is fairly concentrated in those two funds.
The ugly
- If rates move sharply and inflation expectations shift together, BND and SCHP can stop behaving like separate shock absorbers and start behaving like one larger duration position.
- If the dividend factor falls out of favor across regions, SCHD and PID can rhyme with each other in exactly the annoying way correlated assets do.
Next steps
- Portfolios with this structure are often compared against sleeves whose return drivers are less tied to rates or dividends, because that is where the current overlap lives.
- The diversification picture would change most if the bond cluster or the dividend-equity cluster were broken into exposures with different macro sensitivities.
- The current mix is best described as moderately diversified, with respectable ballast and two obvious correlation clumps.
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 5 assets, with an effective number of assets of 4.26, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is well-distributed across most of your holdings, with only mild concentration in a few names. True diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.
Diversification Ratio
1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | All Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diversification Ratio | 1.32 | 1.29 | 1.32 | 1.35 | 1.39 |
The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.39, in line with the typical range across portfolios.
Income Portfolio correlation to the S&P 500 Index
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.72 |
Benchmark Correlations
Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. SCHD has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.81, while BND has the lowest at -0.04.
Asset Correlations Table
Find what Income Portfolio is missing
See which holdings overlap, where Income Portfolio is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.
Analyze Diversification