PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AWP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for AWP

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in AWP, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every year.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 13, 2026, the AWP returned 8.30% Year-To-Date and 13.18% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.50%0.31%8.56%8.85%24.33%19.37%11.84%13.61%
Portfolio
AWP
0.53%-0.68%8.30%8.39%22.03%19.19%13.94%13.18%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.06%-9.52%-2.47%-2.25%22.21%28.89%17.08%12.15%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.59%0.22%17.57%17.85%37.55%26.43%16.85%21.79%
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.02%0.19%0.55%0.80%3.29%4.15%1.74%1.65%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.54%-0.86%9.07%9.42%25.67%20.86%13.36%15.42%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.75%-0.90%29.56%28.37%34.84%16.18%20.12%9.91%
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.37%4.00%-2.11%-2.09%8.41%18.86%9.15%13.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Nov 18, 2004, AWP's average daily return is +0.04%, while the average monthly return is +0.83%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 7.0 years.

Historically, 65% of months were positive and 35% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +10.2%, while the worst month was Oct 2008 at -13.1%. The longest winning streak lasted 10 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 6 months.

On a daily basis, AWP closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Oct 28, 2008 with a return of +6.9%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -7.3%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20264.12%2.04%-2.25%4.06%1.22%-1.00%8.30%
20253.28%0.57%-0.70%-1.43%3.21%3.24%1.08%2.56%3.59%1.33%1.53%0.81%20.65%
20240.83%2.95%4.48%-1.91%2.72%1.42%2.31%1.54%1.25%0.80%4.31%-2.87%19.04%
20235.33%-2.90%2.31%1.41%-0.82%3.84%3.49%-0.89%-2.74%-0.92%5.78%3.18%17.91%
20220.08%0.71%2.96%-5.56%3.19%-8.28%5.69%-1.62%-6.72%8.68%4.08%-3.08%-1.37%
2021-0.36%4.81%2.44%3.55%2.75%0.60%-0.39%1.76%-1.11%5.85%-1.89%2.63%22.31%

Benchmark Metrics

AWP has an annualized alpha of 3.45%, beta of 0.67, and R2 of 0.88 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since November 18, 2004.

  • This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (74.46%) than losses (65.96%) - typical of diversified or defensive assets.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 3.45% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
  • Beta of 0.67 indicates this portfolio moves significantly less than S&P 500 Index - a genuinely defensive profile with reduced participation in both market rallies and downturns.

Alpha
3.45%
Beta
0.67
0.88
Upside Capture
74.46%
Downside Capture
65.96%

Expense Ratio

AWP has an expense ratio of 0.16%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

AWP ranks 84 for risk / return — in the top 84% of Portfolios on our site. This means strong returns relative to risk — exactly what professional investors look for. Well-suited for investors who want to maximize return per unit of risk.


AWP Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AWP Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
AWP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for AWP and compares them with S&P 500 Index.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

2.46

1.86

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

3.28

2.53

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.34

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.06

2.53

+2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.01

11.37

+6.64


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
26
0.871.241.180.982.81
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
69
2.092.731.373.0111.22
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
85
2.433.971.503.6414.45
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
67
1.982.681.362.7412.39
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
58
1.822.401.303.108.63
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
15
0.420.671.080.421.08

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk. Learn how to interpret the Sharpe ratio.

The current AWP Sharpe ratio is 2.46 as of Jun 13, 2026 (the value is recalculated daily), calculated over the past 12 months.

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.53 to 2.41, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio is in the top 25%. This signifies superior risk-adjusted performance, meaning the portfolio is delivering strong returns for the level of risk taken compared to most others.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of AWP compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

AWP provided a 1.61% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio1.61%1.73%1.82%1.76%1.57%1.23%1.72%2.17%1.73%1.36%4.21%1.47%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.39%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.68%3.81%3.92%2.99%1.30%0.26%0.94%2.12%1.72%0.98%0.71%0.54%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.00%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.59%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.49%1.31%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.87%2.08%1.48%21.10%1.95%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the AWP. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the AWP was 39.07%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 420 trading sessions.

The current AWP drawdown is 1.76%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

Financial crisis2007–2009
-39.07%Mar 2009
1y 4mo1y 8mo
3y 4dNov 2007 - Nov 2010
COVID crash2020
-25.44%Mar 2020
1mo 2d4mo 16d
5mo 18dFeb 2020 - Aug 2020
Bear market2022
-14.85%Sep 2022
6mo 2d8mo 9d
1y 2moMar 2022 - Jun 2023
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-14.49%Dec 2018
10mo 29d3mo 29d
1y 2moJan 2018 - Apr 2019
2011 correction2011
-13.87%Oct 2011
5mo 4d4mo 3d
9mo 7dMay 2011 - Feb 2012

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 6 assets, with an effective number of assets of 5.88, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.68

1.45

1.40

1.33

1.31

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.31, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.

AWP correlation to the S&P 500 Index

AWP has a 0.76 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2004

0.90


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. SPY has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.99, while SHY has the lowest at -0.18.

SHY
-0.18
GLD
0.07
XLE
0.59
XLF
0.81
QQQ
0.89
SPY
0.99

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. AWP. SPY has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.90, while SHY has the lowest at -0.13.

SHY
-0.13
GLD
0.30
XLE
0.77
XLF
0.78
QQQ
0.78
SPY
0.90

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Nov 18, 2004
Diversification Analysis

Find what AWP is missing

See which holdings overlap, where AWP is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification