PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Experimentation Antibubble
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for Experimentation Antibubble

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Experimentation Antibubble, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
1.75%-0.09%8.02%7.15%22.78%19.45%11.73%13.53%
Portfolio
Experimentation Antibubble
2.06%2.63%11.17%9.22%26.40%19.19%10.06%
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
3.34%6.28%20.10%17.29%42.23%20.69%6.63%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.20%2.49%7.11%5.30%18.41%15.97%10.63%13.19%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.75%0.42%9.00%7.83%24.47%20.67%12.08%14.93%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
2.98%4.36%13.87%9.93%27.19%18.98%6.06%12.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Oct 13, 2020, Experimentation Antibubble's average daily return is +0.05%, while the average monthly return is +1.11%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 5.2 years.

Historically, 62% of months were positive and 38% were negative. The best month was Nov 2020 with a return of +12.9%, while the worst month was Sep 2022 at -9.2%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.

On a daily basis, Experimentation Antibubble closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +9.2%, while the worst single day was Apr 4, 2025 at -5.8%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20262.18%0.32%-4.96%9.28%5.78%-1.29%11.17%
20253.56%-2.04%-5.53%-0.85%5.43%4.73%2.19%2.84%3.16%1.64%0.93%-0.27%16.37%
20240.18%5.04%3.04%-4.82%3.63%1.86%3.05%2.24%2.32%-1.43%7.31%-3.86%19.41%
20236.66%-2.76%1.63%0.39%-0.78%6.74%3.37%-2.32%-4.83%-3.48%8.97%5.92%19.99%
2022-7.40%-2.14%2.27%-8.41%-0.61%-7.81%8.86%-3.43%-9.24%8.31%5.98%-5.15%-19.21%
2021-0.44%3.37%2.43%4.36%0.53%2.27%1.24%2.38%-4.66%6.46%-2.09%3.46%20.54%

Benchmark Metrics

Experimentation Antibubble has an annualized alpha of -0.81%, beta of 1.00, and R2 of 0.95 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since October 13, 2020.

  • With beta of 1.00 and R2 of 0.95, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index - much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Alpha
-0.81%
Beta
1.00
0.95
Upside Capture
96.93%
Downside Capture
100.82%

Expense Ratio

Experimentation Antibubble has an expense ratio of 0.06%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Experimentation Antibubble ranks 48 for risk / return — on par with similar Portfolios. You're getting a typical balance of risk and reward. Not a standout, but not a red flag either — a reasonable choice if other factors align with your goals.


Experimentation Antibubble Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
Experimentation Antibubble Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Experimentation Antibubble Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
Experimentation Antibubble Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
Experimentation Antibubble Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
Experimentation Antibubble Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for Experimentation Antibubble and compares them with S&P 500 Index.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

2.03

1.85

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

2.81

2.52

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

2.52

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.23

11.31

+1.92


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
822.242.991.393.5815.04
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
651.822.641.322.349.39
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
721.952.641.352.7612.38
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
571.532.161.262.679.41

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

The current Experimentation Antibubble Sharpe ratio is 2.03 as of Jun 11, 2026 (the value is recalculated daily), calculated over the past 12 months.

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.45 to 2.28, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Experimentation Antibubble compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Experimentation Antibubble provided a 1.10% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio1.10%1.22%1.29%1.40%1.52%1.25%1.18%1.35%1.61%1.37%1.55%1.63%
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
0.73%0.85%0.77%0.67%0.76%0.91%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.47%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.03%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
1.02%1.14%1.09%1.27%1.15%1.13%1.07%1.30%1.66%1.25%1.43%1.35%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Experimentation Antibubble. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Experimentation Antibubble was 27.07%, occurring on Oct 14, 2022. Recovery took 339 trading sessions.

The current Experimentation Antibubble drawdown is 4.02%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

Bear market2022
-27.07%Oct 2022
11mo 1d1y 4mo
2y 3moNov 2021 - Feb 2024
2025 selloff2025
-19.15%Apr 2025
1mo 17d2mo 24d
4mo 11dFeb 2025 - Jul 2025
2026 pullback2026
-8.93%Mar 2026
1mo 18d15d
2mo 3dFeb 2026 - Apr 2026
2024 pullback2024
-7.57%Aug 2024
19d18d
1mo 7dJul 2024 - Aug 2024
2020 pullback2020
-6.92%Oct 2020
17d6d
23dOct 2020 - Nov 2020

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 3.33, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is well-distributed across most of your holdings, with only mild concentration in a few names. True diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.05

1.04

1.04

1.04

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.04, placing it in the bottom quartile across portfolios — positions are highly correlated. Consider adding assets from different classes or sectors to reduce risk.

Experimentation Antibubble correlation to the S&P 500 Index

Experimentation Antibubble has a 0.94 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020

0.96


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. VTI has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.99, while QQQJ has the lowest at 0.84.

QQQJ
0.84
VXF
0.85
VIG
0.90
VTI
0.99

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. Experimentation Antibubble. VTI has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.98, while VIG has the lowest at 0.91.

VIG
0.91
QQQJ
0.93
VXF
0.94
VTI
0.98

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

VIGQQQJVXFVTI
VIG1.000.740.780.89
QQQJ0.741.000.930.88
VXF0.780.931.000.90
VTI0.890.880.901.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Oct 13, 2020
Diversification Analysis

Find what Experimentation Antibubble is missing

See which holdings overlap, where Experimentation Antibubble is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification