PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Conservative Portfolio
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for Conservative Portfolio

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Conservative Portfolio, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jul 29, 2026, the Conservative Portfolio returned 4.68% Year-To-Date and 6.59% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1M6MYTD1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*ALL TIME*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.21%1.02%6.45%8.52%16.26%17.48%10.95%13.08%8.07%
Portfolio
Conservative Portfolio
0.11%-0.21%2.98%4.68%9.87%9.73%4.94%6.59%6.25%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
0.01%0.29%1.78%2.03%3.78%4.56%3.52%2.23%1.37%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.25%-1.07%-0.26%0.03%3.50%3.96%-0.28%1.38%3.02%
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
0.23%-0.90%0.16%0.62%2.66%3.69%0.34%2.35%2.73%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
0.22%1.04%7.26%9.82%18.07%18.70%11.48%14.46%9.56%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
-0.64%-1.46%3.22%10.96%23.14%16.14%8.31%9.17%6.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jan 28, 2011, Conservative Portfolio's average daily return is +0.03%, while the average monthly return is +0.52%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 11.1 years.

Historically, 68% of months were positive and 32% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +5.9%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -6.1%. The longest winning streak lasted 15 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, Conservative Portfolio closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 13, 2020 with a return of +4.3%, while the worst single day was Mar 12, 2020 at -5.5%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20261.23%1.07%-2.96%4.21%2.21%-0.14%-0.86%4.68%
20251.66%0.62%-1.52%0.25%2.09%2.65%0.59%1.77%1.83%1.11%0.37%0.13%12.11%
20240.22%1.38%1.76%-2.44%2.64%1.28%1.87%1.51%1.56%-1.62%2.46%-1.89%8.92%
20234.27%-2.12%2.38%0.75%-0.70%2.46%1.52%-1.29%-2.77%-1.62%5.46%3.63%12.22%
2022-3.02%-1.23%-0.22%-4.89%0.19%-4.12%4.54%-2.81%-6.04%2.64%4.32%-2.43%-12.89%
2021-0.29%0.47%0.91%2.26%0.65%1.09%1.17%0.93%-2.12%2.47%-0.71%1.49%8.54%

Benchmark Metrics

Conservative Portfolio has an annualized alpha of 1.45%, beta of 0.38, and R2 of 0.87 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since January 28, 2011.

  • This portfolio participated in 46.52% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 42.30% of its upside - more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.
  • Beta of 0.38 indicates this portfolio moves significantly less than S&P 500 Index - a genuinely defensive profile with reduced participation in both market rallies and downturns.

Alpha
1.45%
Beta
0.38
0.87
Upside Capture
42.30%
Downside Capture
46.52%

Expense Ratio

Conservative Portfolio has an expense ratio of 0.05%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Conservative Portfolio ranks 61 for risk / return — better than 61% of Portfolios on our site. You're getting solid returns for the risk taken. A good sign, especially for investors who want growth without excessive volatility.


Conservative Portfolio Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
Conservative Portfolio Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Conservative Portfolio Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
Conservative Portfolio Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
Conservative Portfolio Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
Conservative Portfolio Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conservative Portfolio and compares them with S&P 500 Index.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

1.60

1.29

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

2.31

1.82

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.23

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

1.80

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.41

7.70

+1.71


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
100
19.09152.2568.95347.192,462.14
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
36
0.951.401.161.313.37
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
33
0.801.191.141.383.80
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
61
1.411.981.252.038.81
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
60
1.401.961.262.067.63

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk. Learn how to interpret the Sharpe ratio.

The current Conservative Portfolio Sharpe ratio is 1.60 as of Jul 29, 2026 (the value is recalculated daily), calculated over the past 12 months.

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.08 to 1.89, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Conservative Portfolio compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Conservative Portfolio provided a 3.03% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio3.03%3.04%3.02%2.87%2.87%1.97%1.57%2.26%2.36%1.94%1.84%1.69%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.81%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%0.00%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
4.00%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
SCHP
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
4.50%4.06%2.99%3.02%7.19%4.39%1.11%2.02%2.26%1.90%1.38%0.28%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.07%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.63%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Conservative Portfolio. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Conservative Portfolio was 17.37%, occurring on Oct 14, 2022. Recovery took 358 trading sessions.

The current Conservative Portfolio drawdown is 1.27%.


Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

Related event

-17.37%Oct 2022
11mo 8d1y 5mo
2y 4moNov 2021 - Mar 2024
Bear market2022
-15.34%Mar 2020
27d2mo 22d
3mo 19dFeb 2020 - Jun 2020
COVID crash2020
-7.45%Dec 2018
3mo 26d2mo 19d
6mo 15dAug 2018 - Mar 2019
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-7.03%Oct 2011
2mo 10d3mo 17d
5mo 27dJul 2011 - Jan 2012
-6.79%Jan 2016
8mo 28d4mo 18d
1y 1moApr 2015 - Jun 2016

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

AI Analysis


The gist

The portfolio is mostly a two-sleeve bet: a core equity market exposure through Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS), wrapped in a bond stack that is partly diversified and partly just different labels for duration and inflation risk.

The numbers

  • Diversification ratio is 1.29 incept-to-date, around the 53.9th percentile on the platform; that is real diversification, but not the kind that makes correlations disappear.
  • Effective number of assets is 4.26 of 5, so the weights are fairly spread; concentration is not the issue here.
  • The 1Y DR is 1.18 versus 1.29 incept, which says the sleeves have been a bit more synchronized recently than over the longer sample.

The good

  • The bond mix is not monolithic: iShares SCHP (SCHP) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) are meaningfully different on inflation sensitivity, and iShares Treasury Bond ETF (BIL) sits outside that duration cluster.
  • The equity sleeve has clean global exposure, with VTI and VXUS capturing most of the equity beta in a simple way.
  • Correlations across the bond and equity sleeves are low enough to keep the whole thing from behaving like one trade.

The bad

  • VTI and VXUS are highly correlated at 0.82; that is two equity market exposures, not two independent engines.
  • BND and SCHP are also tightly linked at 0.78, so the bond side is more of a rate/inflation variant than a separate source of return behavior.
  • The portfolio’s own correlations say the real partition is equities versus fixed income, which is fine, but not especially elaborate.

The ugly

  • In a regime where inflation stays sticky and rates stay jumpy, BND and SCHP can move together for the same unhelpful reason, while BIL remains too small to change the story much.
  • If global equities and U.S. equities sell off together, as they often do when macro gets loud, the VTI/VXUS pair offers less insulation than the labels suggest.

Next steps

  • Portfolios with this correlation profile are usually understood as a modest two-factor structure: equity beta plus duration/inflation sensitivity.
  • The DR pattern suggests the portfolio has held up as a diversified object over time, though recent windows have been somewhat less decorrelated.
  • The bond cluster and the equity cluster are each internally coherent, which is the nice way to say the portfolio is simpler than its five tickers imply.
AI-generated analysis. Not investment advice. Verify key facts independently.
Was this useful?

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 5 assets, with an effective number of assets of 4.26, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is well-distributed across most of your holdings, with only mild concentration in a few names. True diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.18

1.24

1.25

1.26

1.29

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.29, in line with the typical range across portfolios.

Conservative Portfolio correlation to the S&P 500 Index

Conservative Portfolio has a 0.93 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011

0.92


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. VTI has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.99, while BND has the lowest at -0.07.

BND
-0.07
SCHP
-0.06
BIL
-0.00
VXUS
0.81
VTI
0.99

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. Conservative Portfolio. VTI has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.93, while BIL has the lowest at 0.01.

BIL
0.01
SCHP
0.21
BND
0.21
VXUS
0.86
VTI
0.93

Asset Correlations Table

See how each holding historically moved in relation to the other holdings, the portfolio, and the selected benchmark.

Based on daily historical returns since Jan 28, 2011
Diversification Analysis

Find what Conservative Portfolio is missing

See which holdings overlap, where Conservative Portfolio is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification